Scholarlink

Purpose of Review <p>To summarize studies analyzing whether remnant cholesterol should be a target for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p> Recent Findings <p>There is a growing body of evidence from epidemiologic and Mendelian randomization studies implicating remnant cholesterol as a causal risk factor for ASCVD. However, the results of randomized controlled trials, particularly those conducted in the current high-intensity statin era, have been inconsistent. Most recently, the PROMINENT trial failed to show a beneficial effect of 0.4&#xa0;mg/day of pemafibrate on the risk of ASCVD. In the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS), which mimics PROMINENT, the estimated hazard ratio for ASCVD was 1.05 (0.96–1.14) when absolute changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were combined, whereas the hazard ratio for ASCVD in PROMINENT was 1.03 (0.91–1.15).</p> Summary <p>Further trials are warranted to ascertain the efficacy of novel remnant cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering agents in the prevention of ASCVD. To reduce ASCVD, active agents need to reduce total atherogenic cholesterol (LDL and remnant cholesterol) and apolipoprotein B.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Remnant Cholesterol: Should it be a Target for Prevention of ASCVD?

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月25日

查看全文
  • Takahito Doi,
  • Anne Langsted,
  • Børge Grønne Nordestgaard

摘要

Purpose of Review

To summarize studies analyzing whether remnant cholesterol should be a target for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Recent Findings

There is a growing body of evidence from epidemiologic and Mendelian randomization studies implicating remnant cholesterol as a causal risk factor for ASCVD. However, the results of randomized controlled trials, particularly those conducted in the current high-intensity statin era, have been inconsistent. Most recently, the PROMINENT trial failed to show a beneficial effect of 0.4 mg/day of pemafibrate on the risk of ASCVD. In the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS), which mimics PROMINENT, the estimated hazard ratio for ASCVD was 1.05 (0.96–1.14) when absolute changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were combined, whereas the hazard ratio for ASCVD in PROMINENT was 1.03 (0.91–1.15).

Summary

Further trials are warranted to ascertain the efficacy of novel remnant cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering agents in the prevention of ASCVD. To reduce ASCVD, active agents need to reduce total atherogenic cholesterol (LDL and remnant cholesterol) and apolipoprotein B.