<p>We compare three definitions of the equivariant cohomological dimension of a group with operators, coming from Takasu, Adamson and Bredon relative group cohomologies, giving examples of strict inequality in all cases where it can occur. We prove and make use of Stallings-Swan type results which characterise the groups of equivariant cohomological dimension one. Some of our examples are relevant to Farber’s problem which asks for an algebraic characterisation of the topological complexity of discrete groups. In particular, the topological complexity of a group is not in general given by a relative cohomological dimension of the product relative to the diagonal subgroup.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of equivariant cohomological dimensions

  • Mark Grant,
  • Kevin Li,
  • Ehud Meir,
  • Irakli Patchkoria

摘要

We compare three definitions of the equivariant cohomological dimension of a group with operators, coming from Takasu, Adamson and Bredon relative group cohomologies, giving examples of strict inequality in all cases where it can occur. We prove and make use of Stallings-Swan type results which characterise the groups of equivariant cohomological dimension one. Some of our examples are relevant to Farber’s problem which asks for an algebraic characterisation of the topological complexity of discrete groups. In particular, the topological complexity of a group is not in general given by a relative cohomological dimension of the product relative to the diagonal subgroup.