<p>Assume that Δ<sub><i>h</i></sub> is the hyperbolic Laplacian in the unit ball <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb{B}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">B</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and assume that Φ<sub><i>n</i></sub> is the unique radial solution of Poisson equation Δ<sub><i>h</i></sub> log Φ<sub><i>n</i></sub> = − 4(<i>n</i> − 1)<sup>2</sup> satisfying the condition Φ<sub><i>n</i></sub>(0) = 1 and Φ<sub><i>n</i></sub>(<i>ζ</i>) = 0 for <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta\in\partial\mathbb{B}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∂</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">B</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We explicitly solve the question of maximizing <Equation ID="Equ1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R_n}({f,\Omega}) = {{\int_\Omega {{{\vert {f(x)} \vert}^2}\Phi _n^\alpha ({\vert x \vert})d\tau (x)}} \over {\Vert f \Vert_{{\rm{B}}_\alpha ^2}^2}},\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>α</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mi>d</mi> <mi>τ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> <mrow> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">∥</mo> <mi>f</mi> <msubsup> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">∥</mo> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">B</mi> </mrow> </mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> </math></EquationSource> </Equation> over all <i>f</i> ∈ <b>B</b><Stack> <sub><i>α</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> </Stack> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega\subset\mathbb{B}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> <mo>⊂</mo> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">B</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <i>τ</i>(Ω) = <i>s</i>, where <i>dτ</i> denotes the invariant measure on <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb{B}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">B</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Vert f \Vert_{B_\alpha ^2}^2 = \int_{\mathbb{B}} {{{\vert {f(x)} \vert}^2}\Phi _n^\alpha ({\vert x \vert})d\tau} (x)&lt; \infty\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mo>∥</mo> <mi>f</mi> <msubsup> <mo>∥</mo> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>B</mi> <mi>α</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">B</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>α</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo fence="false" stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mi>d</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p><p>This result extends the main result of Tilli and the second author [20] to a higher-dimensional context. Our proof relies on a version of the techniques used for the two-dimensional case, with additional technical challenges arising from the definition of the weights Φ<sub><i>n</i></sub> through hypergeometric functions. Additionally, we show that an immediate relationship between a concentration result for log-subharmonic functions and one for the Wavelet transform is only available in dimension one.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Faber–Krahn type inequality for log-subharmonic functions in the hyperbolic ball

  • David Kalaj,
  • João P. G. Ramos

摘要

Assume that Δh is the hyperbolic Laplacian in the unit ball \(\mathbb{B}\) B and assume that Φn is the unique radial solution of Poisson equation Δh log Φn = − 4(n − 1)2 satisfying the condition Φn(0) = 1 and Φn(ζ) = 0 for \(\zeta\in\partial\mathbb{B}\) ζ B . We explicitly solve the question of maximizing \({R_n}({f,\Omega}) = {{\int_\Omega {{{\vert {f(x)} \vert}^2}\Phi _n^\alpha ({\vert x \vert})d\tau (x)}} \over {\Vert f \Vert_{{\rm{B}}_\alpha ^2}^2}},\) R n ( f , Ω ) = Ω | f ( x ) | 2 Φ n α ( | x | ) d τ ( x ) f B α 2 2 , over all fB α 2 and \(\Omega\subset\mathbb{B}\) Ω B with τ(Ω) = s, where denotes the invariant measure on \(\mathbb{B}\) B , and \(\Vert f \Vert_{B_\alpha ^2}^2 = \int_{\mathbb{B}} {{{\vert {f(x)} \vert}^2}\Phi _n^\alpha ({\vert x \vert})d\tau} (x)< \infty\) f B α 2 2 = B | f ( x ) | 2 Φ n α ( | x | ) d τ ( x ) < .

This result extends the main result of Tilli and the second author [20] to a higher-dimensional context. Our proof relies on a version of the techniques used for the two-dimensional case, with additional technical challenges arising from the definition of the weights Φn through hypergeometric functions. Additionally, we show that an immediate relationship between a concentration result for log-subharmonic functions and one for the Wavelet transform is only available in dimension one.