<p>We study the problem of selecting, in a measurable manner, equilibria from each of a family of games. Typical equilibrium selection theorems assume continuity in, and compactness of, actions, while we merely assume equilibria exist for all games in the family, and payoffs are jointly Borel in parameter and actions. The existence of Lebesgue- or universally measurable selectors turns out to be independent of ZFC; the result is robust to restriction to zero-sum games, as well as to allowing mixed strategies. We show, however, that the existence of analytically measurable selections, well-known to exist for single decision makers, fails for families of two-player zero-sum games.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Independence of existence of measurable equilibrium selections

  • Yehuda John Levy

摘要

We study the problem of selecting, in a measurable manner, equilibria from each of a family of games. Typical equilibrium selection theorems assume continuity in, and compactness of, actions, while we merely assume equilibria exist for all games in the family, and payoffs are jointly Borel in parameter and actions. The existence of Lebesgue- or universally measurable selectors turns out to be independent of ZFC; the result is robust to restriction to zero-sum games, as well as to allowing mixed strategies. We show, however, that the existence of analytically measurable selections, well-known to exist for single decision makers, fails for families of two-player zero-sum games.