<p>We explore new areas of applications of the Banach fixed-point theorem to solve some problems arising in mathematical economics with a special attention paid to the insurance mathematics and the solvency challenges faced by insurance companies in their daily business activities. We use Banach’s contraction principle to construct sequences of new monotone, attainable upper and lower bounds for the deficit distribution at ruin <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11784_2025_1173_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Psi (u,\,y)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of the insurer, considered as a function of the initial surplus (capital) <i>u</i> and the severity of ruin <i>y</i>. We investigate a monotone risk operator L on a properly defined complete metric space <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11784_2025_1173_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle {\mathcal {R}}, {d_r} \rangle \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">R</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in which <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11784_2025_1173_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Psi (u,\,y)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is shown to be the unique fixed point. What is more, L is proven to be a contraction on <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11784_2025_1173_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle {\mathcal {R}}, {d_r} \rangle \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">R</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The resulting procedure allows the insurer to approximate <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11784_2025_1173_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Psi (u,\,y)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (and effectively control the error of approximation) by iterating L on any point from <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11784_2025_1173_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle {\mathcal {R}}, {d_r} \rangle \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">R</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The approach presented in this paper enables to treat in a unified way some discrete and continuous-time insolvency risk models. All the lower and upper bounds for <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11784_2025_1173_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Psi (u,\,y)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> introduced in this paper are shown to be attainable for arbitrary values of <i>u</i> and <i>y</i> under both discrete and continuous-time setting.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Applications of the Banach fixed-point theorem to analyze insolvency problems of an insurance company

  • Lesław Gajek,
  • Marcin Rudź

摘要

We explore new areas of applications of the Banach fixed-point theorem to solve some problems arising in mathematical economics with a special attention paid to the insurance mathematics and the solvency challenges faced by insurance companies in their daily business activities. We use Banach’s contraction principle to construct sequences of new monotone, attainable upper and lower bounds for the deficit distribution at ruin \(\Psi (u,\,y)\) Ψ ( u , y ) of the insurer, considered as a function of the initial surplus (capital) u and the severity of ruin y. We investigate a monotone risk operator L on a properly defined complete metric space \(\langle {\mathcal {R}}, {d_r} \rangle \) R , d r in which \(\Psi (u,\,y)\) Ψ ( u , y ) is shown to be the unique fixed point. What is more, L is proven to be a contraction on \(\langle {\mathcal {R}}, {d_r} \rangle \) R , d r . The resulting procedure allows the insurer to approximate \(\Psi (u,\,y)\) Ψ ( u , y ) (and effectively control the error of approximation) by iterating L on any point from \(\langle {\mathcal {R}}, {d_r} \rangle \) R , d r . The approach presented in this paper enables to treat in a unified way some discrete and continuous-time insolvency risk models. All the lower and upper bounds for \(\Psi (u,\,y)\) Ψ ( u , y ) introduced in this paper are shown to be attainable for arbitrary values of u and y under both discrete and continuous-time setting.