Scholarlink

Purpose <p>This study reports the thoughts and experiences of a sample of these patients regarding audiology and hearing impairment during CT. It expands on recent research in a large, publicly funded tertiary hospital in Australia that revealed that patients receiving ototoxic, cumulative cisplatin chemotherapy (CT) had a median of zero encounters with audiology (IQR = 0–1) during their treatment. This finding was in contrast with international audiological ototoxicity monitoring (OtoM) guidelines that recommend prospective OtoM for all patients undergoing CT.</p> Sample and setting <p>Fifteen adults from a cohort of 189 cancer patients were interviewed who received CT at a large Australian tertiary hospital between 1st January and 31st December 2023.</p> Study design <p>A convergent parallel mixed-method design was utilised for this study.</p> Procedures <p>Participants completed a demographic and hearing handicap questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. Patient demographics were described, and interview transcripts were analysed using inductive content analysis.</p> Results <p>Scores on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory Screening Tool ranged from 0 to 26 out of a maximum score of 40. Of the fifteen participants, 12 reported symptoms of hearing loss, 10 reported symptoms of tinnitus, and 8 reported symptoms of both. Patients described their experiences in vivid and emotive detail. Patient thoughts and experiences fell into two major themes. The first theme, ‘Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment’, had four distinct subcategories of content—information and information needs, side effects of cancer treatment, ongoing quality of life, and memory. The second theme, ‘Audiology Experience and Hearing’, had six subcategories of content: referral process, audiology experience and education, self-management, tinnitus, hearing, and recommendations to improve the process.</p> Implications for cancer survivors <p>This study has highlighted unmet needs relating to ototoxicity across the processes of audiological monitoring and referral, provision of information to patients, and provider awareness of services in the Australian public health system. The absence of audiological OtoM could deny patients access to the information needed to make informed decisions regarding their hearing during their chemotherapy treatment. These findings can be used to benchmark areas for improvement and address limitations in audiology referral processes and OtoM care pathways in Australia.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Where are audiologists in the room of wizards? Oncology patient experiences with audiology in an Australian public hospital

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月14日

查看全文
  • Georgia M. Lester,
  • Barbra H. B. Timmer,
  • Wayne J. Wilson,
  • Rahul M. Ladwa

摘要

Purpose

This study reports the thoughts and experiences of a sample of these patients regarding audiology and hearing impairment during CT. It expands on recent research in a large, publicly funded tertiary hospital in Australia that revealed that patients receiving ototoxic, cumulative cisplatin chemotherapy (CT) had a median of zero encounters with audiology (IQR = 0–1) during their treatment. This finding was in contrast with international audiological ototoxicity monitoring (OtoM) guidelines that recommend prospective OtoM for all patients undergoing CT.

Sample and setting

Fifteen adults from a cohort of 189 cancer patients were interviewed who received CT at a large Australian tertiary hospital between 1st January and 31st December 2023.

Study design

A convergent parallel mixed-method design was utilised for this study.

Procedures

Participants completed a demographic and hearing handicap questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. Patient demographics were described, and interview transcripts were analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results

Scores on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory Screening Tool ranged from 0 to 26 out of a maximum score of 40. Of the fifteen participants, 12 reported symptoms of hearing loss, 10 reported symptoms of tinnitus, and 8 reported symptoms of both. Patients described their experiences in vivid and emotive detail. Patient thoughts and experiences fell into two major themes. The first theme, ‘Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment’, had four distinct subcategories of content—information and information needs, side effects of cancer treatment, ongoing quality of life, and memory. The second theme, ‘Audiology Experience and Hearing’, had six subcategories of content: referral process, audiology experience and education, self-management, tinnitus, hearing, and recommendations to improve the process.

Implications for cancer survivors

This study has highlighted unmet needs relating to ototoxicity across the processes of audiological monitoring and referral, provision of information to patients, and provider awareness of services in the Australian public health system. The absence of audiological OtoM could deny patients access to the information needed to make informed decisions regarding their hearing during their chemotherapy treatment. These findings can be used to benchmark areas for improvement and address limitations in audiology referral processes and OtoM care pathways in Australia.