Scholarlink

Purpose <p>This study explored oncologists’ reported conversations with adult cancer survivors about three modifiable risk behaviors: poor diet, smoking, and insufficient physical activity. These behaviors can increase disease recurrence and early mortality. By asking oncologists to report their approach to these discussions, we can begin to identify areas for improvement.</p> Methods <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 oncology clinicians from various subspecialties. We identified themes using inductive thematic analysis.</p> Results <p>Four major themes were identified. Participants reported only sometimes explicitly discussing risk behaviors and avoiding sensitive topics like weight. They described tailoring their conversations around what they believe a patient can handle to maintain a positive relationship or avoid hurting patients’ self-image. Participants explained that they rely on specialists or programs for specific risk management strategies and indicated that patients most often initiate conversations about lifestyle risks. Participants avoided or indirectly discussed lifestyle risks.</p> Conclusion <p>The oncologists’ reported risk communication with survivors suggested a delicate balance between patient-centered communication and benevolent bias—where oncologists tailor conversations based on their perceptions of what a patient can handle. Indirect discussions may lead survivors to undervalue the importance of addressing these risks. To enhance communication effectiveness and avoid unmanaged risk behaviors, oncologists need support to be more fully engaged in specific risk management conversations with cancer survivors.</p> Implications for Cancer Survivors <p>Oncologists’ benevolent bias may lead to inadequate risk management by the clinician and result in survivors underestimating the importance of specific risk factors, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Speaking of survival: oncologists’ approaches to risk behavior conversations with cancer survivors

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月15日

查看全文
  • Savanna Kerstiens,
  • Courtney Lynam Scherr,
  • Maia Jacobs,
  • Allison J. Carroll,
  • Monisola Jayeoba,
  • Elyse Renee Daly,
  • Siobhan M. Phillips,
  • Brian Hitsman,
  • Sofia F. Garcia,
  • Bonnie Spring

摘要

Purpose

This study explored oncologists’ reported conversations with adult cancer survivors about three modifiable risk behaviors: poor diet, smoking, and insufficient physical activity. These behaviors can increase disease recurrence and early mortality. By asking oncologists to report their approach to these discussions, we can begin to identify areas for improvement.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 oncology clinicians from various subspecialties. We identified themes using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Four major themes were identified. Participants reported only sometimes explicitly discussing risk behaviors and avoiding sensitive topics like weight. They described tailoring their conversations around what they believe a patient can handle to maintain a positive relationship or avoid hurting patients’ self-image. Participants explained that they rely on specialists or programs for specific risk management strategies and indicated that patients most often initiate conversations about lifestyle risks. Participants avoided or indirectly discussed lifestyle risks.

Conclusion

The oncologists’ reported risk communication with survivors suggested a delicate balance between patient-centered communication and benevolent bias—where oncologists tailor conversations based on their perceptions of what a patient can handle. Indirect discussions may lead survivors to undervalue the importance of addressing these risks. To enhance communication effectiveness and avoid unmanaged risk behaviors, oncologists need support to be more fully engaged in specific risk management conversations with cancer survivors.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Oncologists’ benevolent bias may lead to inadequate risk management by the clinician and result in survivors underestimating the importance of specific risk factors, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes.