Background <p>We aimed to establish the most predictive echocardiographic indicator of appropriate tightness of bilateral pulmonary artery banding (BPAB).</p> Methods <p>In part A of the study, we retrospectively analyzed the peak flow velocity (PV) and nadir flow velocity (NV) across the band and the ratio of NV to PV (velocity ratio: VR) to determine appropriate band tightness. In part B, we prospectively studied the utility of the best predictive indicators.</p> Results <p>Thirty-one patients undergoing BPAB were enrolled in part A and identified as having appropriate pulmonary blood flow (APF), high pulmonary blood flow (HPF), or low pulmonary blood flow (LPF) during the postoperative period. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for HPF were 0.92 for PV, 0.99 for NV, and 0.99 for VR; the velocity thresholds were 2.47, 1.15, and 0.45&#xa0;m/sec, respectively. For LPF, the AUCs were 0.63 for PV, 0.78 for NV, and 0.81 for VR, and the velocity thresholds were 2.70, 1.59, and 0.58&#xa0;m/sec, respectively; thus, VR best indicated band tightness. In part B, we performed BPAB in 34 patients, adjusting the bands to achieve VRs between 0.45 and 0.58. The prevalence of HPF was significantly lower in part B than in part A, whereas those of LPF did not differ.</p> Conclusion <p>In BPAB, we consider the optimal range of VR at banding site is between 0.45 and 0.58.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Intraoperative echocardiographic indicator for optimal bilateral pulmonary artery banding

  • Tetsuri Takei,
  • Yukihiro Kaneko,
  • Ryoichi Kondo,
  • Naho Morisaki,
  • Ikuya Achiwa

摘要

Background

We aimed to establish the most predictive echocardiographic indicator of appropriate tightness of bilateral pulmonary artery banding (BPAB).

Methods

In part A of the study, we retrospectively analyzed the peak flow velocity (PV) and nadir flow velocity (NV) across the band and the ratio of NV to PV (velocity ratio: VR) to determine appropriate band tightness. In part B, we prospectively studied the utility of the best predictive indicators.

Results

Thirty-one patients undergoing BPAB were enrolled in part A and identified as having appropriate pulmonary blood flow (APF), high pulmonary blood flow (HPF), or low pulmonary blood flow (LPF) during the postoperative period. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for HPF were 0.92 for PV, 0.99 for NV, and 0.99 for VR; the velocity thresholds were 2.47, 1.15, and 0.45 m/sec, respectively. For LPF, the AUCs were 0.63 for PV, 0.78 for NV, and 0.81 for VR, and the velocity thresholds were 2.70, 1.59, and 0.58 m/sec, respectively; thus, VR best indicated band tightness. In part B, we performed BPAB in 34 patients, adjusting the bands to achieve VRs between 0.45 and 0.58. The prevalence of HPF was significantly lower in part B than in part A, whereas those of LPF did not differ.

Conclusion

In BPAB, we consider the optimal range of VR at banding site is between 0.45 and 0.58.