<p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in internal medicine and often requires timely echocardiographic assessment. Limited availability of standard studies may delay management, particularly in acute or resource-limited settings. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study across 35 Spanish hospitals, enrolling adults with new-onset or chronic AF without echocardiography in the previous 12&#xa0;months, comparing internist-performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) with blinded cardiologist-performed transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE) as the reference standard. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for structural abnormalities. Secondary outcomes included comparison with auscultation and the clinical impact of POCUS findings. Among 441 patients (mean age 80.4 ± 9.9&#xa0;years; 51% women), POCUS showed good diagnostic accuracy for left ventricular (LV) dilation (sensitivity 83%, specificity 94%) and LV systolic dysfunction (sensitivity 81%, specificity 94%), and moderate accuracy for left atrial (LA) enlargement (sensitivity 91%, specificity 64%). Compared with auscultation, POCUS was significantly more accurate for detecting mitral and tricuspid disease. POCUS findings frequently prompted therapeutic adjustments, including anticoagulation in mitral stenosis, individualized rate-control strategies in LV dysfunction, diuretic titration in congestion, and referral for significant valvular disease. Pericardial effusion, though less common, strongly influenced management. Internist-performed POCUS demonstrated robust diagnostic performance in AF and directly informed bedside therapeutic decisions. Although it does not replace comprehensive echocardiography, particularly for detailed valvular assessment, it represents a valuable extension of the physical examination and may improve timely and equitable cardiac evaluation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of internist-performed point-of-care ultrasound in atrial fibrillation: a multicenter study

  • Serafín López Palmero,
  • Juan Manuel García Torrecillas,
  • José María López Martín,
  • Enrique Rodilla Sala,
  • María Elena Rodríguez Rodríguez,
  • Ricardo Gómez Huelgas,
  • Ana María Alguacil Muñoz,
  • Raúl Antonio Ruiz Ortega,
  • Oier Ateka Barrutia,
  • Ginés López Martínez,
  • Nicasio Marín Gámez,
  • Gonzalo García de Casasola Sánchez,
  • Juan Salillas Hernando,
  • Alberto Moreno Fernández,
  • Jorge Rubio Gracia,
  • Marta Torres Arrese,
  • José Manuel Machín Lázaro,
  • Alberto Benavente Fernández,
  • Pablo Cabrera García,
  • Paula Nadal Gómez,
  • Ana Beatriz Vázquez Suárez,
  • Laisa Socorro Briongos Figuero,
  • Samuel García Rubio,
  • Tesifón Parrón Carreño,
  • Yale Tung-Chen,
  • Manuel Jesús Soriano Pérez,
  • José Luis Serrano Carrillo de Albornoz,
  • Nerea Castillo Fernández,
  • Javier Rodríguez Moreno,
  • Sergio Fernández Ontiveros,
  • Antonio Rosales Castillo,
  • Antonio Torres Gómez,
  • Julián Tejero Cobos,
  • Javier Castilla Yélamo,
  • Alberto Díaz Cáceres,
  • Antonio Espino Montoro,
  • Juan Francisco Laso Trillo,
  • Santiago Pintos Martínez,
  • Carlos Jiménez Guardiola,
  • José María Cepeda Rodrigo,
  • Andrés Baumela Puertas,
  • Bartolomé García Pérez,
  • Javier Hergueta González,
  • Eugenio Puga Alcalde,
  • Rocío García Alonso,
  • Sheila Romero Ruperto,
  • Andrés de la Peña Fernández,
  • María Antonia Ribot Sansó,
  • Jaime Orfila Timoner,
  • José López Castro,
  • Manuel Méndez Bailón,
  • María Rosario Iguarán Bermúdez,
  • Gonzalo Serralta San Martín,
  • Rodrigo Martínez Prado,
  • Ángela Rodrigo Martínez,
  • Mercedes Duffort Falcó,
  • Miguel Ángel Casado Suela,
  • Juan Torres Macho,
  • Martín Fabregate Fuente,
  • Luis Manzano Espinosa,
  • José María García Vallejo,
  • Jerónimo Artiles Vizcaíno

摘要

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in internal medicine and often requires timely echocardiographic assessment. Limited availability of standard studies may delay management, particularly in acute or resource-limited settings. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study across 35 Spanish hospitals, enrolling adults with new-onset or chronic AF without echocardiography in the previous 12 months, comparing internist-performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) with blinded cardiologist-performed transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE) as the reference standard. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for structural abnormalities. Secondary outcomes included comparison with auscultation and the clinical impact of POCUS findings. Among 441 patients (mean age 80.4 ± 9.9 years; 51% women), POCUS showed good diagnostic accuracy for left ventricular (LV) dilation (sensitivity 83%, specificity 94%) and LV systolic dysfunction (sensitivity 81%, specificity 94%), and moderate accuracy for left atrial (LA) enlargement (sensitivity 91%, specificity 64%). Compared with auscultation, POCUS was significantly more accurate for detecting mitral and tricuspid disease. POCUS findings frequently prompted therapeutic adjustments, including anticoagulation in mitral stenosis, individualized rate-control strategies in LV dysfunction, diuretic titration in congestion, and referral for significant valvular disease. Pericardial effusion, though less common, strongly influenced management. Internist-performed POCUS demonstrated robust diagnostic performance in AF and directly informed bedside therapeutic decisions. Although it does not replace comprehensive echocardiography, particularly for detailed valvular assessment, it represents a valuable extension of the physical examination and may improve timely and equitable cardiac evaluation.