Scholarlink

<p>This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A comprehensive search of online databases was carried out to identify studies comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Safety outcomes assessed included operative complications and conversion rates, while efficacy parameters comprised length of hospital stay, total operative time, postoperative analgesic use, and procedure cost. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. A total of 157 articles were screened, 5 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, encompassing 548 children. Included studies reported instances of shorter LOS, reduced analgesic requirements, lower conversion and reintervention rates, and fewer postoperative complications in the RAC groups; however, none of these differences reached statistical significance. This meta-analysis found no meaningful differences between RAC and LC regarding safety and efficacy outcomes, suggesting that RAC is comparable to LC in the pediatric population.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: a meta-analysis with systematic review of comparative studies

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月22日

查看全文
  • Maria Klimeczek-Chrapusta,
  • Kacper Stolarz,
  • Bartosz Gęgała,
  • Alicja Kot,
  • Zofia Łubniewska,
  • Maciej Preinl,
  • Bartosz Bogusz,
  • Maria Gruba,
  • Anna Dąbrowska,
  • Wojciech Górecki

摘要

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A comprehensive search of online databases was carried out to identify studies comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Safety outcomes assessed included operative complications and conversion rates, while efficacy parameters comprised length of hospital stay, total operative time, postoperative analgesic use, and procedure cost. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. A total of 157 articles were screened, 5 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, encompassing 548 children. Included studies reported instances of shorter LOS, reduced analgesic requirements, lower conversion and reintervention rates, and fewer postoperative complications in the RAC groups; however, none of these differences reached statistical significance. This meta-analysis found no meaningful differences between RAC and LC regarding safety and efficacy outcomes, suggesting that RAC is comparable to LC in the pediatric population.