Scholarlink

<p>In this position statement, the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) highlights the evaluation of ring-augmented procedures in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS). A GRADE-based systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess their effectiveness and safety. The analysis included 28 studies with 6939 patients. The findings demonstrated that ring augmentation in bariatric procedures may provide superior or comparable weight loss outcomes compared to standard procedures, although results were heterogenous and evidence quality varied. Ring-related complications and removal rates were generally low. While further high-quality, long-term studies are needed, current evidence cautiously supports selective use of ring augmentation in both primary and revisional MBS, particularly for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (raRYGB). </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Ring-augmented Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Procedures GRADE-based International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Position Statement

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月2日

查看全文
  • Kayleigh Ann Martina van Dam,
  • Maurizio De Luca,
  • Matteo Monami,
  • Evert-Jan Gijsbert Boerma,
  • Giovanni Merola,
  • Antonio Vitiello,
  • Ricardo Cohen,
  • Ashraf Haddad,
  • Khaled Gawdat,
  • Jodok Fink,
  • Hayssam Fawal,
  • Amanda Belluzzi,
  • Jan Willem Greve

摘要

In this position statement, the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) highlights the evaluation of ring-augmented procedures in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS). A GRADE-based systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess their effectiveness and safety. The analysis included 28 studies with 6939 patients. The findings demonstrated that ring augmentation in bariatric procedures may provide superior or comparable weight loss outcomes compared to standard procedures, although results were heterogenous and evidence quality varied. Ring-related complications and removal rates were generally low. While further high-quality, long-term studies are needed, current evidence cautiously supports selective use of ring augmentation in both primary and revisional MBS, particularly for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (raRYGB).