Scholarlink

<p>In this MBSAQIP database study of over 560,000 bariatric procedures, the overall incidence of anastomotic leaks was 0.21%. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was associated with a significantly higher leak rate compared to the laparoscopic approach. No significant differences in leak rates were observed between robotic and laparoscopic techniques for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or duodenal switch. Prior foregut surgery and intraoperative drain placement were independently associated with increased risk of leak across all procedures.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparing Anastomotic Leak Rate Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Procedures: A Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database Study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月17日

查看全文
  • Alexandria Jones,
  • Alexander Hall,
  • Kalyana Nandipati

摘要

In this MBSAQIP database study of over 560,000 bariatric procedures, the overall incidence of anastomotic leaks was 0.21%. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was associated with a significantly higher leak rate compared to the laparoscopic approach. No significant differences in leak rates were observed between robotic and laparoscopic techniques for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or duodenal switch. Prior foregut surgery and intraoperative drain placement were independently associated with increased risk of leak across all procedures.