Scholarlink

<p>This study investigates the fireside corrosion behavior of four (Ni-22Cr, Ni-25Cr, Co-25Cr, and NiCo-25Cr) coatings, which were applied using twin wire arc spray technique and subjected to simulated waste-burning environments (a gas composition containing HCl, SO<sub>2</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, balance N<sub>2</sub>, plus a salt deposit of 50wt.% KCl + 50wt.% K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>). The coatings deposited on a conventional base steel alloy (E−250) were tested under these conditions at 550&#xa0;°C for 500&#xa0;h in a laboratory-scale atmosphere controlled furnace. After the fireside exposure, the samples were studied using optical microscopy, SEM-EDX, and XRD to deduce coatings performance and possible corrosion mechanisms. The results indicated that all coatings, except Ni-22Cr, outperformed the E−250 steel. The Ni-22Cr and NiCo-25Cr coatings showed similar pitting corrosion behavior with more prominent corrosion pits on Ni-22Cr coating’s surface. The Co-25Cr coating showed slightly improved performance to the above two coatings, which can be attributed to the ability of Co to resist corrosion attack under these conditions. Overall, the Ni-25Cr coating composition was conclusively found to be most effective. </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Fireside Corrosion Behavior of Thermally Sprayed Coatings for Waste-to-Energy Power Plant Applications

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • Ahmad Usman,
  • Luis Isern Arrom,
  • John Nicholls,
  • Mario Cordero,
  • Adnan U. Syed

摘要

This study investigates the fireside corrosion behavior of four (Ni-22Cr, Ni-25Cr, Co-25Cr, and NiCo-25Cr) coatings, which were applied using twin wire arc spray technique and subjected to simulated waste-burning environments (a gas composition containing HCl, SO2, CO2, N2, H2O, balance N2, plus a salt deposit of 50wt.% KCl + 50wt.% K2SO4). The coatings deposited on a conventional base steel alloy (E−250) were tested under these conditions at 550 °C for 500 h in a laboratory-scale atmosphere controlled furnace. After the fireside exposure, the samples were studied using optical microscopy, SEM-EDX, and XRD to deduce coatings performance and possible corrosion mechanisms. The results indicated that all coatings, except Ni-22Cr, outperformed the E−250 steel. The Ni-22Cr and NiCo-25Cr coatings showed similar pitting corrosion behavior with more prominent corrosion pits on Ni-22Cr coating’s surface. The Co-25Cr coating showed slightly improved performance to the above two coatings, which can be attributed to the ability of Co to resist corrosion attack under these conditions. Overall, the Ni-25Cr coating composition was conclusively found to be most effective.