<p>We experimentally investigate how electronic interactions between dopamine molecules and TiO<sub>2</sub> influence the photoluminescence (PL) quenching behavior of TiO<sub>2</sub> nanorods with different crystalline phase structures. Both single-phase rutile TiO<sub>2</sub> nanorods (R-TNRs) and mixed-phase anatase/rutile TiO<sub>2</sub> nanorods (A/R-TNRs) show pronounced dopamine concentration-dependent PL quenching; however, a clear phase-dependent effect is observed, with A/R-TNRs demonstrating a significantly higher PL quenching efficiency than R-TNRs. Specifically, at a dopamine concentration of 0.001&#xa0;µM, the PL quenching efficiency of A/R-TNRs reaches approximately 46%, whereas the corresponding values for R-TNRs are only 21%. The dopamine-concentration-dependent PL quenching of TiO<sub>2</sub> nanorods is primarily attributed to dopamine oxidation induced by photogenerated charge carriers and/or interfacial charge transfer from TiO<sub>2</sub> nanorods to dopamine quinone. In contrast, the markedly enhanced PL quenching efficiency observed for A/R-TNRs arises from the combined effects of their higher surface reactivity, associated with both the mixed-phase nanorods and the anatase phase TiO<sub>2</sub> thin film substrates, and the improved exciton dissociation efficiency induced by the coexistence of anatase and rutile phases. These results not only provide a comprehensive understanding of the interaction between dopamine and TiO<sub>2</sub> that governs the PL quenching behavior of TiO<sub>2</sub> nanorods but also highlight the strong potential of anatase/rutile TiO<sub>2</sub> nanorod-based architectures for high-sensitivity dopamine sensing applications.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effects of Structural Phases on Fluorescence Quenching of TiO2 Nanorods in Presence of Dopamine Molecules

  • Thi Thanh Hoa Nguyen,
  • Nghia Nguyen Tri,
  • Duc Thang Pham,
  • Hanh Hong Mai,
  • Giang Bach Huong,
  • Huy Nguyen Duy,
  • Annisa Aprilia,
  • Quang-Duy Dao

摘要

We experimentally investigate how electronic interactions between dopamine molecules and TiO2 influence the photoluminescence (PL) quenching behavior of TiO2 nanorods with different crystalline phase structures. Both single-phase rutile TiO2 nanorods (R-TNRs) and mixed-phase anatase/rutile TiO2 nanorods (A/R-TNRs) show pronounced dopamine concentration-dependent PL quenching; however, a clear phase-dependent effect is observed, with A/R-TNRs demonstrating a significantly higher PL quenching efficiency than R-TNRs. Specifically, at a dopamine concentration of 0.001 µM, the PL quenching efficiency of A/R-TNRs reaches approximately 46%, whereas the corresponding values for R-TNRs are only 21%. The dopamine-concentration-dependent PL quenching of TiO2 nanorods is primarily attributed to dopamine oxidation induced by photogenerated charge carriers and/or interfacial charge transfer from TiO2 nanorods to dopamine quinone. In contrast, the markedly enhanced PL quenching efficiency observed for A/R-TNRs arises from the combined effects of their higher surface reactivity, associated with both the mixed-phase nanorods and the anatase phase TiO2 thin film substrates, and the improved exciton dissociation efficiency induced by the coexistence of anatase and rutile phases. These results not only provide a comprehensive understanding of the interaction between dopamine and TiO2 that governs the PL quenching behavior of TiO2 nanorods but also highlight the strong potential of anatase/rutile TiO2 nanorod-based architectures for high-sensitivity dopamine sensing applications.