<p>This study conducted hydrogen enriching and releasing experiments on stainless steel X17CrNi16-2 in a vacuum tube furnace. The results showed that at 1823 K and hydrogen pressures of 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10 MPa, hydrogen mass fraction in the steel reached 18.5&#xa0;×&#xa0;10<sup>−6</sup>, 20.1&#xa0;×&#xa0;10<sup>−6</sup>, and 22.5&#xa0;×&#xa0;10<sup>−6</sup>, respectively. During vacuum treatment at pressures of 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 MPa, hydrogen release lasted 5 minutes, with hydrogen mass fraction reaching 11.1&#xa0;×&#xa0;10<sup>−6</sup>, 13.4&#xa0;×&#xa0;10<sup>−6</sup>, and 15.5&#xa0;×&#xa0;10<sup>−6</sup>. Both the hydrogen enriching and releasing processes approached equilibrium approximately and conformed to Sievert's law. In the initial 80 pct stage of hydrogen enriching, the rate was controlled by hydrogen mass transfer within the steel, with a mass transfer coefficient of 0.144 cm/s. In the final 20 pct stage, a combination of the interfacial chemical reaction and hydrogen mass transfer controlled the rate, with the interfacial reaction playing a larger role, was addressed. During the hydrogen releasing experiments, the appearance of bubbles in the first minute made the kinetic integral equations inappropriate for data fitting, and hydrogen mass transfer within the steel was the rate-limiting step. After the first minute, the hydrogen release rate significantly decreased, controlled by a combination of hydrogen mass transfer and the interfacial chemical reaction, with hydrogen mass transfer being dominant. The equilibrium constant <i>K</i><sub>H</sub> for the reaction <InternalRef RefID="Equ1">1</InternalRef>/2H<sub>2</sub>&#xa0;→&#xa0;[H] was significantly lower than 1, suggesting that the rate constant for the forward reaction <i>k</i><sub>R</sub> was substantially smaller than the rate constant for the reverse reaction <i>k</i><sub>R−</sub>, as described by the relationship <i>K</i><sub>H</sub> = <i>k</i><sub>R</sub>/<i>k</i><sub>R−</sub>. This suggests that the latter stages of hydrogen enriching are more likely to be controlled by the interfacial chemical reaction, whereas hydrogen releasing is less likely to be influenced by this factor.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Experimental Study on Thermokinetics of Hydrogen Enrichment and Release In X17CrNi16-2 Stainless Steel Melts

  • Wei Li,
  • Jianhua Liu,
  • Jie Zhang,
  • Baijun Yan,
  • Yang He,
  • Yudi Zhang,
  • Yuweng Qu

摘要

This study conducted hydrogen enriching and releasing experiments on stainless steel X17CrNi16-2 in a vacuum tube furnace. The results showed that at 1823 K and hydrogen pressures of 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10 MPa, hydrogen mass fraction in the steel reached 18.5 × 10−6, 20.1 × 10−6, and 22.5 × 10−6, respectively. During vacuum treatment at pressures of 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 MPa, hydrogen release lasted 5 minutes, with hydrogen mass fraction reaching 11.1 × 10−6, 13.4 × 10−6, and 15.5 × 10−6. Both the hydrogen enriching and releasing processes approached equilibrium approximately and conformed to Sievert's law. In the initial 80 pct stage of hydrogen enriching, the rate was controlled by hydrogen mass transfer within the steel, with a mass transfer coefficient of 0.144 cm/s. In the final 20 pct stage, a combination of the interfacial chemical reaction and hydrogen mass transfer controlled the rate, with the interfacial reaction playing a larger role, was addressed. During the hydrogen releasing experiments, the appearance of bubbles in the first minute made the kinetic integral equations inappropriate for data fitting, and hydrogen mass transfer within the steel was the rate-limiting step. After the first minute, the hydrogen release rate significantly decreased, controlled by a combination of hydrogen mass transfer and the interfacial chemical reaction, with hydrogen mass transfer being dominant. The equilibrium constant KH for the reaction 1/2H2 → [H] was significantly lower than 1, suggesting that the rate constant for the forward reaction kR was substantially smaller than the rate constant for the reverse reaction kR−, as described by the relationship KH = kR/kR−. This suggests that the latter stages of hydrogen enriching are more likely to be controlled by the interfacial chemical reaction, whereas hydrogen releasing is less likely to be influenced by this factor.