Scholarlink

<p>This paper offers an overview of current research on the effectiveness of interventions in teacher education. We synthesize 27&#xa0;reviews published between 2010 and 2024, comprising 510 research publications of empirical intervention studies targeting pre-service and in-service teachers’ professional learning. We applied a&#xa0;specific analysis category system to address five research questions concerning (1)&#xa0;justifications and theoretical frameworks, (2)&#xa0;input and output of the intervention studies, (3)&#xa0;study design, (4)&#xa0;effect sizes, and (5)&#xa0;research gaps. Few reviews had developed their own theoretical framework, and justifications for the interventions’ necessity were not always elaborated. Most assumed the existence of an effect chain—namely, that the reviewed interventions help promote teacher variables (mainly competence facets), which are then positively reflected in teaching quality and students’ learning gains. However, study variables typically indicate only segments of the effect chain while comprehensive operationalization of the total effect chain is rare. Interventions are typically organized as coursework, not necessarily connected to teaching practice or student learning. The interventions’ targeted learning outcomes are heterogeneously operationalized. Basic design features appear typical for intervention studies in teacher education, whereas more challenging designs are less common. Self-report instruments appear more common than rigorous measurement approaches. Based on a&#xa0;subsample of 14&#xa0;reviews reporting summarized effect sizes, we conducted a&#xa0;meta-meta-analysis that shows an overall significant moderate effect of interventions is observable. Differentiation shows stronger effects for proximal outcomes (e.g., change in teacher knowledge or instructional practice) than for student learning. The synthesis of moderator effects yielded mixed results, and the quality of interventions appears more crucial than the length. Research gaps concern further theoretical development, the individual intervention studies’ research methodological standards, and improvement of literature reviews’ methodological quality. The results offer a&#xa0;theoretical background for future research on teacher education interventions and research progress in teacher education effectiveness. Recommendations for future research are given.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effectiveness of interventions in teacher education: Synthesis of reviews (2010–2024)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月16日

查看全文
  • Johannes König,
  • Sandra Heine,
  • Jonas Weyers,
  • Carl-Gereon Arntz,
  • Charlotte Kramer,
  • Sarah Strauß,
  • Kristina Gerhard,
  • Janine Mühle,
  • Tim Engartner,
  • Jörg Großschedl,
  • Charlotte Hanisch,
  • Petra Hanke,
  • Thomas Hennemann,
  • Jörg Jost,
  • Kai Kaspar,
  • Benjamin Rott

摘要

This paper offers an overview of current research on the effectiveness of interventions in teacher education. We synthesize 27 reviews published between 2010 and 2024, comprising 510 research publications of empirical intervention studies targeting pre-service and in-service teachers’ professional learning. We applied a specific analysis category system to address five research questions concerning (1) justifications and theoretical frameworks, (2) input and output of the intervention studies, (3) study design, (4) effect sizes, and (5) research gaps. Few reviews had developed their own theoretical framework, and justifications for the interventions’ necessity were not always elaborated. Most assumed the existence of an effect chain—namely, that the reviewed interventions help promote teacher variables (mainly competence facets), which are then positively reflected in teaching quality and students’ learning gains. However, study variables typically indicate only segments of the effect chain while comprehensive operationalization of the total effect chain is rare. Interventions are typically organized as coursework, not necessarily connected to teaching practice or student learning. The interventions’ targeted learning outcomes are heterogeneously operationalized. Basic design features appear typical for intervention studies in teacher education, whereas more challenging designs are less common. Self-report instruments appear more common than rigorous measurement approaches. Based on a subsample of 14 reviews reporting summarized effect sizes, we conducted a meta-meta-analysis that shows an overall significant moderate effect of interventions is observable. Differentiation shows stronger effects for proximal outcomes (e.g., change in teacher knowledge or instructional practice) than for student learning. The synthesis of moderator effects yielded mixed results, and the quality of interventions appears more crucial than the length. Research gaps concern further theoretical development, the individual intervention studies’ research methodological standards, and improvement of literature reviews’ methodological quality. The results offer a theoretical background for future research on teacher education interventions and research progress in teacher education effectiveness. Recommendations for future research are given.