<p>Housing is crucial for people to flourish, as it is more than shelter and physical infrastructure. The conversation discusses trajectories and ‘variegations’ in universal, decommodified, non-profit housing provision in Scandinavian countries, focusing on Sweden (<i>allmännyttan</i>) and Denmark (<i>almen). </i>It explores how Sweden’s municipal rental housing was transformed by neoliberal market fundamentalism, while the Danish tenant-owned housing associations turned out to be more resilient to neoliberal reforms. The conversation’s second part discusses the potential of a&#xa0;moral economy perspective to enrich our understanding of contemporary transformations. Such a&#xa0;perspective involves reintroducing moral arguments pointing towards a&#xa0;sustainable organisation of livelihoods, not least with regard to privatisation, individualisation and financialisation and their impact on inequalities. A&#xa0;moral economy approach allows to broaden the objects of study, moving towards an integrated analysis of habitation, including sustainable and caring neighbourhoods, by transcending academic habits of myopic disciplinary isolation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The moral economy of housing provision in Scandinavia and beyond: A conversation

  • Eric Clark,
  • Andreas Novy,
  • Hans Volmary

摘要

Housing is crucial for people to flourish, as it is more than shelter and physical infrastructure. The conversation discusses trajectories and ‘variegations’ in universal, decommodified, non-profit housing provision in Scandinavian countries, focusing on Sweden (allmännyttan) and Denmark (almen). It explores how Sweden’s municipal rental housing was transformed by neoliberal market fundamentalism, while the Danish tenant-owned housing associations turned out to be more resilient to neoliberal reforms. The conversation’s second part discusses the potential of a moral economy perspective to enrich our understanding of contemporary transformations. Such a perspective involves reintroducing moral arguments pointing towards a sustainable organisation of livelihoods, not least with regard to privatisation, individualisation and financialisation and their impact on inequalities. A moral economy approach allows to broaden the objects of study, moving towards an integrated analysis of habitation, including sustainable and caring neighbourhoods, by transcending academic habits of myopic disciplinary isolation.