Scholarlink

Background <p>Physicians’ understanding of patients as persons can bolster relationships and help patients feel seen. Including personal details in electronic health records (EHR) may enhance care, but the types of details physicians document about patients’ lifeworlds remain largely uncharacterized.</p> Objective <p>To assess the prevalence and types of personalizing language written by physicians in clinical encounter notes.</p> Design <p>Cross-sectional qualitative content analysis of physician-written history and physical (H&amp;P) notes.</p> Patients <p>Adult patients admitted to the internal medicine inpatient service at an urban academic tertiary care hospital.</p> Approach <p>We performed an inductive content analysis of H&amp;P notes. Two authors independently coded instances of personalizing language: details about patients’ unique identities, social context, life experiences, and perspectives. The study team met periodically to discuss examples and categories and compare assessments until thematic saturation was reached. We summarized the prevalence of personalizing language and described its content.</p> Key Results <p>We reviewed 570 H&amp;P notes written about 437 unique patients (median age 57; 53% Black, 38% White; 54% male) by 186 physicians. More than half of notes (60%) contained at least one instance of personalizing language (median 2, range 1–7 per note). We identified 840 instances of personalizing language across seven domains: family (41%), work/education (32%), residence (21%), personal interests (2.9%), pets (1.8%), travel (0.6%), and goals/priorities (0.6%). Nearly half (47%) referred to general social context; 51% provided more detailed information. Only 1.9% described patients’ thoughts, feelings, or goals. Personalizing language was more commonly used in notes for men vs women (70% vs 60%, p = 0.02).</p> Conclusions <p>Most H&amp;P notes included personalizing language, though many provided limited detail and very few described patients’ interests, goals, and priorities. Future studies should evaluate patient perceptions of personalizing language in the medical record and its impact on physician attitudes towards and relationships with patients.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exploring the Patient’s Lifeworld: A Qualitative Study of Personalizing Language in Electronic Health Records

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月31日

查看全文
  • Akanksha Suresh,
  • Priyanka Fernandes,
  • Ayah Zirikly,
  • Elaine C. Thompson,
  • Anne R. Links,
  • Keith Harrigian,
  • Brant Chee,
  • Mark Dredze,
  • Mary Catherine Beach,
  • Somnath Saha

摘要

Background

Physicians’ understanding of patients as persons can bolster relationships and help patients feel seen. Including personal details in electronic health records (EHR) may enhance care, but the types of details physicians document about patients’ lifeworlds remain largely uncharacterized.

Objective

To assess the prevalence and types of personalizing language written by physicians in clinical encounter notes.

Design

Cross-sectional qualitative content analysis of physician-written history and physical (H&P) notes.

Patients

Adult patients admitted to the internal medicine inpatient service at an urban academic tertiary care hospital.

Approach

We performed an inductive content analysis of H&P notes. Two authors independently coded instances of personalizing language: details about patients’ unique identities, social context, life experiences, and perspectives. The study team met periodically to discuss examples and categories and compare assessments until thematic saturation was reached. We summarized the prevalence of personalizing language and described its content.

Key Results

We reviewed 570 H&P notes written about 437 unique patients (median age 57; 53% Black, 38% White; 54% male) by 186 physicians. More than half of notes (60%) contained at least one instance of personalizing language (median 2, range 1–7 per note). We identified 840 instances of personalizing language across seven domains: family (41%), work/education (32%), residence (21%), personal interests (2.9%), pets (1.8%), travel (0.6%), and goals/priorities (0.6%). Nearly half (47%) referred to general social context; 51% provided more detailed information. Only 1.9% described patients’ thoughts, feelings, or goals. Personalizing language was more commonly used in notes for men vs women (70% vs 60%, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Most H&P notes included personalizing language, though many provided limited detail and very few described patients’ interests, goals, and priorities. Future studies should evaluate patient perceptions of personalizing language in the medical record and its impact on physician attitudes towards and relationships with patients.