Scholarlink

Background <p>Rural primary care clinicians face numerous challenges when caring for patients using prescription opioid medication for chronic pain. Research has elucidated the magnitude of the opioid use problem and novel management approaches. Rural primary care clinicians’ experiences caring for patients on prescription opioids amidst deprescribing pressures are less well studied.</p> Objective <p>To explore rural primary care clinicians’ experiences caring for patients they inherited from other clinicians who were also currently requiring high doses of opioids.</p> Design <p>Exploratory qualitative interview study using a constructivist grounded theory approach within an interpretivist paradigm.</p> Participants <p>Twelve rural primary care clinicians (physicians, physician associates, nurse practitioners).</p> Approach <p>A network of 29 rural public hospitals in Washington State supported voluntary participant recruitment. Semi-structured interviews elicited participants’ examples regarding inherited prescribing, yielding descriptively rich cases. Deidentified transcripts were inductively analyzed through code application, thematic development, and constant comparison. Iterative discussions challenged the relationship of the data to the evolving conceptual model.</p> Key Results <p>Researchers identified four tension-filled themes. Within the context of the origins of patients’ opioid use, historical prescribing patterns, and clinicians’ practice philosophies, clinicians experienced tensions (1) in relationships with patients, (2) in collaboration with colleagues, (3) with inadequate community resources, and (4) with regulatory environments, all of which influenced their opioid deprescribing efforts in ways that aligned with their relationship-centered philosophies. Participants defined health care broadly to include social determinants of health.</p> Conclusions <p>Multiple conflicting tensions in relationships and with regulations in resource-poor environments make opioid deprescribing difficult. Opioid deprescribing occurs as a relationship-centered activity and conflicts with opioid control policies that target populations for harm reduction. Findings from this research explicate this contradiction in rural settings. Understanding rural health systems in this context and studying effective strategies for including rural clinicians’ voices in policy decisions are areas ripe for future research.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Rural Clinicians Efforts to Maintain Relationship-Centered Care Amidst Conflicting Tensions with Inherited Opioid Prescribing Practices

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月30日

查看全文
  • Judith L. Bowen,
  • Skye McKennon,
  • Hannah Carlan,
  • Connie M. Remsberg,
  • Shawn Andrews,
  • Elya Prystowsky,
  • Jennifer C. Miller,
  • Dawn E. DeWitt

摘要

Background

Rural primary care clinicians face numerous challenges when caring for patients using prescription opioid medication for chronic pain. Research has elucidated the magnitude of the opioid use problem and novel management approaches. Rural primary care clinicians’ experiences caring for patients on prescription opioids amidst deprescribing pressures are less well studied.

Objective

To explore rural primary care clinicians’ experiences caring for patients they inherited from other clinicians who were also currently requiring high doses of opioids.

Design

Exploratory qualitative interview study using a constructivist grounded theory approach within an interpretivist paradigm.

Participants

Twelve rural primary care clinicians (physicians, physician associates, nurse practitioners).

Approach

A network of 29 rural public hospitals in Washington State supported voluntary participant recruitment. Semi-structured interviews elicited participants’ examples regarding inherited prescribing, yielding descriptively rich cases. Deidentified transcripts were inductively analyzed through code application, thematic development, and constant comparison. Iterative discussions challenged the relationship of the data to the evolving conceptual model.

Key Results

Researchers identified four tension-filled themes. Within the context of the origins of patients’ opioid use, historical prescribing patterns, and clinicians’ practice philosophies, clinicians experienced tensions (1) in relationships with patients, (2) in collaboration with colleagues, (3) with inadequate community resources, and (4) with regulatory environments, all of which influenced their opioid deprescribing efforts in ways that aligned with their relationship-centered philosophies. Participants defined health care broadly to include social determinants of health.

Conclusions

Multiple conflicting tensions in relationships and with regulations in resource-poor environments make opioid deprescribing difficult. Opioid deprescribing occurs as a relationship-centered activity and conflicts with opioid control policies that target populations for harm reduction. Findings from this research explicate this contradiction in rural settings. Understanding rural health systems in this context and studying effective strategies for including rural clinicians’ voices in policy decisions are areas ripe for future research.