Scholarlink

Background <p>The growing burden of asynchronous work—such as managing messages, test results, and care coordination—has contributed to clinician burnout and attrition in primary care.</p> Objective <p>To develop and evaluate scheduling templates that allocate time for asynchronous work during clinic sessions and assess their impact on clinicians, patients, and clinical operations.</p> Design <p>We conducted a two-phase Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement initiative at four academic internal medicine clinics in metropolitan Denver. PDSA1 tested five alternative templates with asynchronous work blocks over 3 months for feasibility. PDSA2 evaluated the preferred template over 6 months for effects on clinician and patient satisfaction, clinician career plans, clinical quality, productivity, and access.</p> Participants <p>In total, 27 attending physicians and APPs volunteered for the intervention group in PDSA1; 43 in PDSA2.</p> Intervention <p>Clinical schedule templates with blocked time for non-patient-facing work.</p> Main Measures <p>Survey items on career plans and clinician satisfaction, A1C and hypertension control, breast cancer screening, patient satisfaction, wRVUs, visit volume, and access (appointments made within 14&#xa0;days).</p> Key Results <p>Clinicians in PDSA1 favored a template with asynchronous time embedded in regular sessions with staff support present. Evaluating the preferred schedule template in PDSA2, clinician satisfaction improved (+ 2.25 on a −3 to + 3 scale), and the intention to continue clinical practice effort rose (from 8/37 to 20/34). Clinical quality and patient satisfaction remained stable. Visit volume dropped (−18.3 visits/EffcFTE/month, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), but wRVUs were unaffected (−3.2 wRVUs/EffcFTE/month, <i>p</i> = 0.89). Access declined for both intervention and reference groups (−10% vs. −4%). A focus group emphasized enhanced clinician autonomy and control as key benefits.</p> Conclusions <p>Integrating asynchronous work time into clinic schedules appeared to improve clinician satisfaction and retention without compromising care quality or wRVU productivity, while visit volume and access saw modest declines. This approach may support primary care workforce stability amid increasing asynchronous demands.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Addressing the Burden of Asynchronous Work to Promote Clinician Retention in Ambulatory General Internal Medicine Practices

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月12日

查看全文
  • Robert J. Doolan,
  • Brittney R. Fraumeni,
  • Lisa M. Schilling,
  • Lauren A. Drake,
  • Gena Weir,
  • Anna Furniss,
  • Mark A. Earnest

摘要

Background

The growing burden of asynchronous work—such as managing messages, test results, and care coordination—has contributed to clinician burnout and attrition in primary care.

Objective

To develop and evaluate scheduling templates that allocate time for asynchronous work during clinic sessions and assess their impact on clinicians, patients, and clinical operations.

Design

We conducted a two-phase Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement initiative at four academic internal medicine clinics in metropolitan Denver. PDSA1 tested five alternative templates with asynchronous work blocks over 3 months for feasibility. PDSA2 evaluated the preferred template over 6 months for effects on clinician and patient satisfaction, clinician career plans, clinical quality, productivity, and access.

Participants

In total, 27 attending physicians and APPs volunteered for the intervention group in PDSA1; 43 in PDSA2.

Intervention

Clinical schedule templates with blocked time for non-patient-facing work.

Main Measures

Survey items on career plans and clinician satisfaction, A1C and hypertension control, breast cancer screening, patient satisfaction, wRVUs, visit volume, and access (appointments made within 14 days).

Key Results

Clinicians in PDSA1 favored a template with asynchronous time embedded in regular sessions with staff support present. Evaluating the preferred schedule template in PDSA2, clinician satisfaction improved (+ 2.25 on a −3 to + 3 scale), and the intention to continue clinical practice effort rose (from 8/37 to 20/34). Clinical quality and patient satisfaction remained stable. Visit volume dropped (−18.3 visits/EffcFTE/month, p < 0.01), but wRVUs were unaffected (−3.2 wRVUs/EffcFTE/month, p = 0.89). Access declined for both intervention and reference groups (−10% vs. −4%). A focus group emphasized enhanced clinician autonomy and control as key benefits.

Conclusions

Integrating asynchronous work time into clinic schedules appeared to improve clinician satisfaction and retention without compromising care quality or wRVU productivity, while visit volume and access saw modest declines. This approach may support primary care workforce stability amid increasing asynchronous demands.