Background Accounting for approximately 1 in 4 community-dwelling adults in the United States (US), people with disabilities (PWD) experience significant disparities in health care quality, access, and outcomes. At the same time, US physicians have reported feeling unprepared to care for PWD and have revealed significant negative bias about this population. Objective To understand how physicians are trained to care for PWD in US medical schools. Design Qualitative, critical theory paradigm. Participants US medical school faculty (n = 8) and students (n = 9) were purposively sampled for knowledge of disability-related training based on known engagement in activities to advance disability-related medical education. Inclusion was limited to English language proficiency. Interventions n/a. Approach Data were collected through focus groups, hosted virtually with separate groups for faculty and medical students between September 2021 and February 2022. Each meeting was recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. Deductive and inductive coding schemes were applied by multiple coders until reaching thematic saturation. Key Results Prominent themes revealed critical shortfalls in medical education, including (1) disability being omitted from standard curricula; (2) disability being framed as a problem within individuals; (3) pervasive discrimination against PWD in medicine; and (4) over-reliance on ad hoc faculty and student-led efforts to cultivate curricular change. Data also revealed multifactorial barriers to including disability training as part of US medical education, such as avoidance of personal and institutional responsibility, and permeations of ableism across social and training contexts. Conclusions Medical education may perpetuate negative bias about disability through a hidden curriculum. Insufficient support from institutional and licensing authorities has stymied efforts to expand and improve disability-related training such that disability is not included in existing curricula focused on mitigating health care disparities — despite known vulnerabilities for PWD. Without improvements to disability-related curricular content, physicians will remain ill-equipped to care for the nation’s largest minority group.

“The Forgotten Minority”: Perpetuation of Ableism in Medical Education

期刊论文
发表日期：

2025年1月15日

查看全文

Carol Haywood,
Tara Lagu,
Maggie Salinger,
Roberto López-Rosado,
Christene DeJong,
Lisa I. Iezzoni

摘要

Background

Accounting for approximately 1 in 4 community-dwelling adults in the United States (US), people with disabilities (PWD) experience significant disparities in health care quality, access, and outcomes. At the same time, US physicians have reported feeling unprepared to care for PWD and have revealed significant negative bias about this population.

Objective

To understand how physicians are trained to care for PWD in US medical schools.

Design

Qualitative, critical theory paradigm.

Participants

US medical school faculty (n = 8) and students (n = 9) were purposively sampled for knowledge of disability-related training based on known engagement in activities to advance disability-related medical education. Inclusion was limited to English language proficiency.

Interventions

n/a.

Approach

Data were collected through focus groups, hosted virtually with separate groups for faculty and medical students between September 2021 and February 2022. Each meeting was recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. Deductive and inductive coding schemes were applied by multiple coders until reaching thematic saturation.

Key Results

Prominent themes revealed critical shortfalls in medical education, including (1) disability being omitted from standard curricula; (2) disability being framed as a problem within individuals; (3) pervasive discrimination against PWD in medicine; and (4) over-reliance on ad hoc faculty and student-led efforts to cultivate curricular change. Data also revealed multifactorial barriers to including disability training as part of US medical education, such as avoidance of personal and institutional responsibility, and permeations of ableism across social and training contexts.

Conclusions

Medical education may perpetuate negative bias about disability through a hidden curriculum. Insufficient support from institutional and licensing authorities has stymied efforts to expand and improve disability-related training such that disability is not included in existing curricula focused on mitigating health care disparities — despite known vulnerabilities for PWD. Without improvements to disability-related curricular content, physicians will remain ill-equipped to care for the nation’s largest minority group.