<p>Understanding soil radioactivity in agricultural vineyards is essential for environmental safety and public health. However, limited data exist on radioactivity levels in vineyard soils of mountainous regions, particularly those with natural irrigation sources. This study aims to assess natural and artificial radionuclide levels in vineyard soils and evaluate potential radiological hazards. A total of forty-five soil samples were collected from vineyards across five sub-districts and analyzed using an Ortec high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector (30% relative efficiency) with GammaVision software. Sampling sites were selected based on soil characteristics, irrigation sources and environmental conditions. The activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>&#xa0;K and <sup>137</sup>Cs ranged from (5.5 ± 0.9 to 27.3 ± 0.4) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup> with an average value of (15.5 ± 1.0) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup>, (2.9 ± 0.9 to 18.0 ± 0.6) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup> with an average of (9.1 ± 1.0) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup>, (58.3 ± 0.1 to 318.2 ± 4.6) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup> with an average of (174.9 ± 1.0) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup> and (2.0 ± 0.1 to 17.3 ± 0.9) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup>, with an average value of (8.3 ± 1.0) Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, all below global average levels. To assess potential health risks, key radiological hazard indices were computed, including radium equivalent activity (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11600_2025_1608_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="35" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({Ra}_{eq}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">Ra</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">eq</mi> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), gamma index (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11600_2025_1608_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({I}_{\gamma }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mi>γ</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), absorbed dose rate (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11600_2025_1608_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(D\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>D</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), hazard indexes (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11600_2025_1608_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="82" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({H}_{ex} and {H}_{in}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">ex</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">in</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), annual effective dose rate (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11600_2025_1608_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="153" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\text{AEDR}}_{out} and {\text{AEDR}}_{in}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mtext>AEDR</mtext> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">out</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <msub> <mtext>AEDR</mtext> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">in</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and excess lifetime cancer risk (<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11600_2025_1608_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(ELCR\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">ELCR</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). Were averaged at 41.95 ± 1.67&#xa0;Bq&#xa0;Kg<sup>−1</sup>, 0.31 ± 0.01, 19.93 ± 0.73 nGy&#xa0;h<sup>−1</sup>, 0.11 ± 0.01 and 0.72 ± 0.01, 0.024 ± 0.01&#xa0;mSv&#xa0;y<sup>−1</sup> and 0.189 ± 0.01&#xa0;mSv&#xa0;y<sup>−1</sup> and 0.09 ± 0.0031 × 10<sup>–3</sup>, respectively. The Pearson correlation analysis showed that <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K are strongly correlated and significantly influence radiation hazards, whereas <sup>137</sup>Cs exhibits weak correlations, indicating its minimal contribution to radiation risks. This study provides baseline data for vineyard soil radioactivity, contributing to environmental risk assessments in naturally irrigated agricultural areas.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessment of radioactivity levels and radiological hazards of soil samples from vineyards in mountainous areas in the Raparin district, Iraqi Kurdistan

  • Nawzad Mustafa Abdulla,
  • Mohammed Ibrahim Mohammed

摘要

Understanding soil radioactivity in agricultural vineyards is essential for environmental safety and public health. However, limited data exist on radioactivity levels in vineyard soils of mountainous regions, particularly those with natural irrigation sources. This study aims to assess natural and artificial radionuclide levels in vineyard soils and evaluate potential radiological hazards. A total of forty-five soil samples were collected from vineyards across five sub-districts and analyzed using an Ortec high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector (30% relative efficiency) with GammaVision software. Sampling sites were selected based on soil characteristics, irrigation sources and environmental conditions. The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40 K and 137Cs ranged from (5.5 ± 0.9 to 27.3 ± 0.4) Bq Kg−1 with an average value of (15.5 ± 1.0) Bq Kg−1, (2.9 ± 0.9 to 18.0 ± 0.6) Bq Kg−1 with an average of (9.1 ± 1.0) Bq Kg−1, (58.3 ± 0.1 to 318.2 ± 4.6) Bq Kg−1 with an average of (174.9 ± 1.0) Bq Kg−1 and (2.0 ± 0.1 to 17.3 ± 0.9) Bq Kg−1, with an average value of (8.3 ± 1.0) Bq Kg−1, respectively, all below global average levels. To assess potential health risks, key radiological hazard indices were computed, including radium equivalent activity ( \({Ra}_{eq}\) Ra eq ), gamma index ( \({I}_{\gamma }\) I γ ), absorbed dose rate ( \(D\) D ), hazard indexes ( \({H}_{ex} and {H}_{in}\) H ex a n d H in ), annual effective dose rate ( \({\text{AEDR}}_{out} and {\text{AEDR}}_{in}\) AEDR out a n d AEDR in ) and excess lifetime cancer risk ( \(ELCR\) ELCR ). Were averaged at 41.95 ± 1.67 Bq Kg−1, 0.31 ± 0.01, 19.93 ± 0.73 nGy h−1, 0.11 ± 0.01 and 0.72 ± 0.01, 0.024 ± 0.01 mSv y−1 and 0.189 ± 0.01 mSv y−1 and 0.09 ± 0.0031 × 10–3, respectively. The Pearson correlation analysis showed that 226Ra, 232Th and 40K are strongly correlated and significantly influence radiation hazards, whereas 137Cs exhibits weak correlations, indicating its minimal contribution to radiation risks. This study provides baseline data for vineyard soil radioactivity, contributing to environmental risk assessments in naturally irrigated agricultural areas.