<p>Consider two sequences of heterogeneous and independent portfolios of risks <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T_1,T_2,\ldots \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T^*_{1}, T^*_{2},\ldots \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and, let <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be two positive integer-valued random variables, independent of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T_i'\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T^*_i\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mo>∗</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, respectively. In this article, we investigate different stochastic inequalities involving <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\min \{T_1,\ldots ,T_{N_1}\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo movablelimits="true">min</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\min \{T^*_1,\ldots ,T^*_{N_2}\},\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo movablelimits="true">min</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>∗</mo> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\max \{T_1,\ldots ,T_{N_1}\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo movablelimits="true">max</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\max \{T^*_1,\ldots ,T^*_{N_2}\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo movablelimits="true">max</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>∗</mo> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <msubsup> <mi>T</mi> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>∗</mo> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the sense of usual stochastic order and reversed hazard rate order concerning maltivariate chain majorization order. These new results strengthen and generalize some of the well known results in the literature, including Barmalzan et al. [<CitationRef CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef>], Balakrishnan et al. [<CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef>] and Kundu and Chowdhury [<CitationRef CitationID="CR20">20</CitationRef>] for the case of random claim sizes. Different numerical examples are provided to highlight the applicability of this work. Finally, some interesting applications of our results in reliability theory and auction theory are presented.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Ordering results for extreme claim amounts based on random number of claims

  • Sangita Das

摘要

Consider two sequences of heterogeneous and independent portfolios of risks \(T_1,T_2,\ldots \) T 1 , T 2 , and \(T^*_{1}, T^*_{2},\ldots \) T 1 , T 2 , and, let \(N_1\) N 1 and \(N_2\) N 2 be two positive integer-valued random variables, independent of \(T_i'\) T i and \(T^*_i\) T i , respectively. In this article, we investigate different stochastic inequalities involving \(\min \{T_1,\ldots ,T_{N_1}\}\) min { T 1 , , T N 1 } and \(\min \{T^*_1,\ldots ,T^*_{N_2}\},\) min { T 1 , , T N 2 } , and \(\max \{T_1,\ldots ,T_{N_1}\}\) max { T 1 , , T N 1 } and \(\max \{T^*_1,\ldots ,T^*_{N_2}\}\) max { T 1 , , T N 2 } in the sense of usual stochastic order and reversed hazard rate order concerning maltivariate chain majorization order. These new results strengthen and generalize some of the well known results in the literature, including Barmalzan et al. [7], Balakrishnan et al. [5] and Kundu and Chowdhury [20] for the case of random claim sizes. Different numerical examples are provided to highlight the applicability of this work. Finally, some interesting applications of our results in reliability theory and auction theory are presented.