Scholarlink

<p>A standard view links private law to interpersonal obligations owed to others (bipolar obligations), while viewing criminal law as linked to obligations that are simply required, prohibited, or at most, owed to the state (monadic obligations). This paper interrogates the place of bipolar obligations in criminal law. It proposes a hybrid model, defending the primacy of the monadic wrong while making space for the relevance of bipolar wronging in criminal law.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Wrongs and Wrongings: Bipolar Normativity and the Criminal Law

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月19日

查看全文
  • Leora Dahan Katz

摘要

A standard view links private law to interpersonal obligations owed to others (bipolar obligations), while viewing criminal law as linked to obligations that are simply required, prohibited, or at most, owed to the state (monadic obligations). This paper interrogates the place of bipolar obligations in criminal law. It proposes a hybrid model, defending the primacy of the monadic wrong while making space for the relevance of bipolar wronging in criminal law.