Scholarlink

Background <p>Physical inactivity is a&#xa0;key public health problem which can be counteracted by designing physical activity-friendly environments. Especially the concepts of walkability and bikeability can contribute to an increase of daily physical activity. This article provides an overview of existing questionnaires that can be used to subjectively measure walkability and/or bikeability.</p> Methods <p>A&#xa0;comprehensive search was conducted across five literature databases, three websites, and through additional manual searches to identify scales. Identified scales were subsequently evaluated against five criteria to access their compliance with scientific standards.</p> Results <p>A&#xa0;total of nine questionnaires were identified. Two of these questionnaires are available in German, while another two addresses either the concept of walkability or bikeability.</p> Conclusion <p>This article provides an overview and supports the selection of questionnaires for the measurement of walkability and/or bikeability from a&#xa0;subjective perspective. At the same time, it shows that there is a&#xa0;lack of questionnaires that meet scientific standards, especially in German-speaking countries.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Befragungsinstrumente zur subjektiven Erfassung von Walkability und Bikeability – ein Rapid Review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月1日

查看全文
  • Clara Tristram,
  • Maike Till,
  • Jonas D. Finger,
  • Sophie John,
  • Kristin Manz,
  • Anne K. Reimers

摘要

Background

Physical inactivity is a key public health problem which can be counteracted by designing physical activity-friendly environments. Especially the concepts of walkability and bikeability can contribute to an increase of daily physical activity. This article provides an overview of existing questionnaires that can be used to subjectively measure walkability and/or bikeability.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across five literature databases, three websites, and through additional manual searches to identify scales. Identified scales were subsequently evaluated against five criteria to access their compliance with scientific standards.

Results

A total of nine questionnaires were identified. Two of these questionnaires are available in German, while another two addresses either the concept of walkability or bikeability.

Conclusion

This article provides an overview and supports the selection of questionnaires for the measurement of walkability and/or bikeability from a subjective perspective. At the same time, it shows that there is a lack of questionnaires that meet scientific standards, especially in German-speaking countries.