Purpose Identifying and quantifying coronary artery calcification (CAC) is crucial for preoperative planning, as it helps to estimate both the complexity of the 2D coronary angiography (2DCA) procedure and the risk of developing intraoperative complications. Despite the relevance, the actual practice relies upon visual inspection of the 2DCA image frames by clinicians. This procedure is prone to inaccuracies due to the poor contrast and small size of the CAC; moreover, it is dependent on the physician’s experience. To address this issue, we developed a workflow to assist clinicians in identifying CAC within 2DCA using data from 44 image acquisitions across 14 patients. Methods Our workflow consists of three stages. In the first stage, a classification backbone based on ResNet-18 is applied to guide the CAC identification by extracting relevant features from 2DCA frames. In the second stage, a U-Net decoder architecture, mirroring the encoding structure of the ResNet-18, is employed to identify the regions of interest (ROI) of the CAC. Eventually, a post-processing step refines the results to obtain the final ROI. The workflow was evaluated using a leave-out cross-validation. Results The proposed method outperformed the comparative methods by achieving an F1-score for the classification step of 0.87 (0.77<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11548_2025_3382_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="13" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$-$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>-</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>0.94) (median ± quartiles), while for the CAC identification step the intersection over minimum (IoM) was 0.64 (0.46<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11548_2025_3382_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="13" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$-$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>-</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>0.86) (median ± quartiles). Conclusion This is the first attempt to propose a clinical decision support system to assist the identification of CAC within 2DCA. The proposed workflow holds the potential to improve both the accuracy and efficiency of CAC quantification, with promising clinical applications. As future work, the concurrent use of multiple auxiliary tasks could be explored to further improve the segmentation performance.

A multi-model deep learning approach for the identification of coronary artery calcifications within 2D coronary angiography images

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年5月8日

查看全文

Edoardo De Rose,
Ciro Benito Raggio,
Ahmad Riccardo Rasheed,
Pierangela Bruno,
Paolo Zaffino,
Salvatore De Rosa,
Francesco Calimeri,
Maria Francesca Spadea

摘要

Purpose

Identifying and quantifying coronary artery calcification (CAC) is crucial for preoperative planning, as it helps to estimate both the complexity of the 2D coronary angiography (2DCA) procedure and the risk of developing intraoperative complications. Despite the relevance, the actual practice relies upon visual inspection of the 2DCA image frames by clinicians. This procedure is prone to inaccuracies due to the poor contrast and small size of the CAC; moreover, it is dependent on the physician’s experience. To address this issue, we developed a workflow to assist clinicians in identifying CAC within 2DCA using data from 44 image acquisitions across 14 patients.

Methods

Our workflow consists of three stages. In the first stage, a classification backbone based on ResNet-18 is applied to guide the CAC identification by extracting relevant features from 2DCA frames. In the second stage, a U-Net decoder architecture, mirroring the encoding structure of the ResNet-18, is employed to identify the regions of interest (ROI) of the CAC. Eventually, a post-processing step refines the results to obtain the final ROI. The workflow was evaluated using a leave-out cross-validation.

Results

The proposed method outperformed the comparative methods by achieving an F1-score for the classification step of 0.87 (0.77 $-$ $-$ 0.94) (median ± quartiles), while for the CAC identification step the intersection over minimum (IoM) was 0.64 (0.46 $-$ $-$ 0.86) (median ± quartiles).

Conclusion

This is the first attempt to propose a clinical decision support system to assist the identification of CAC within 2DCA. The proposed workflow holds the potential to improve both the accuracy and efficiency of CAC quantification, with promising clinical applications. As future work, the concurrent use of multiple auxiliary tasks could be explored to further improve the segmentation performance.