Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To evaluate the feasibility of deriving coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores from Virtual-Non-Contrast (VNC) reconstructions obtained with dual-layer computed tomography (DLCT).</p> Methods <p>A retrospective study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with a DLCT scanner. Conventional true non-contrast (TNC) images were reconstructed for CAC quantification (CAC<sub>TNC</sub>). Post-contrast spectral datasets were processed to generate VNC reconstructions, and a 130 HU threshold was applied to calculate the volume of coronary calcified plaques (VOL<sub>VNC</sub>). CAC values from VNC images (CAC<sub>VNC</sub>) were derived through linear regression analysis. Correlation and agreement between CAC measurement methods were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis. Patients were assigned to risk categories according to Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) to evaluate potential misclassifications.</p> Results <p>The median CAC<sub>TNC</sub> was 95 Agatston Unit (AU) [IQR:1–309], while the median CAC<sub>VNC</sub> was 76 AU [IQR:0–340], with no statistically significant difference between the two methods (<i>p</i> = 0.653). An excellent correlation was found between CAC<sub>TNC</sub> and CAC<sub>VNC</sub> (ICC = 0.977), with good agreement demonstrated by Bland–Altman analysis, showing a mean difference of − 1.2 AU. CAC<sub>VNC</sub> led to misclassification in 16% of patients, primarily underestimating the CAC-DRS risk category, yet maintaining strong agreement with CAC<sub>TNC</sub> derived risk stratification.</p> Conclusions <p>VNC reconstructions from DLCT show excellent correlation and good agreement with conventional TNC images for CAC quantification. This approach has the potential to eliminate the need for a dedicated unenhanced scan, thereby reducing radiation exposure, and acquisition time while preserving diagnostic accuracy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantification of coronary artery calcium using virtual non-contrast images derived from dual-layer spectral CT

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月27日

查看全文
  • Ludovica R. M. Lanzafame,
  • Giorgio Ascenti,
  • Silvio Mazziotti,
  • Agatino Cacciola,
  • Dominika Suchá,
  • Simone Terrani,
  • Niels van Der Werf,
  • Thomas J. Vogl,
  • Vitali Koch,
  • Leon D. Grünewald,
  • Christian Booz,
  • Tommaso D’Angelo

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of deriving coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores from Virtual-Non-Contrast (VNC) reconstructions obtained with dual-layer computed tomography (DLCT).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with a DLCT scanner. Conventional true non-contrast (TNC) images were reconstructed for CAC quantification (CACTNC). Post-contrast spectral datasets were processed to generate VNC reconstructions, and a 130 HU threshold was applied to calculate the volume of coronary calcified plaques (VOLVNC). CAC values from VNC images (CACVNC) were derived through linear regression analysis. Correlation and agreement between CAC measurement methods were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis. Patients were assigned to risk categories according to Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) to evaluate potential misclassifications.

Results

The median CACTNC was 95 Agatston Unit (AU) [IQR:1–309], while the median CACVNC was 76 AU [IQR:0–340], with no statistically significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.653). An excellent correlation was found between CACTNC and CACVNC (ICC = 0.977), with good agreement demonstrated by Bland–Altman analysis, showing a mean difference of − 1.2 AU. CACVNC led to misclassification in 16% of patients, primarily underestimating the CAC-DRS risk category, yet maintaining strong agreement with CACTNC derived risk stratification.

Conclusions

VNC reconstructions from DLCT show excellent correlation and good agreement with conventional TNC images for CAC quantification. This approach has the potential to eliminate the need for a dedicated unenhanced scan, thereby reducing radiation exposure, and acquisition time while preserving diagnostic accuracy.