Scholarlink

<p>National well-being reflects multiple psychological dimensions, yet cross-national research often relies on single indicators or economic proxies. Using two waves of the Global Flourishing Survey across 22 countries (Wave 1&#xa0;<i>N</i> = 202,898; analytic sample <i>N</i> = 182,354), country-level profiles were identified based on nine indicators of well-being and psychosocial resources (happiness, life satisfaction, life worthwhileness, autonomy, competence, relatedness, gratitude, hope, life balance). Hierarchical and k-means clustering supported a three-profile solution in both waves. Profiles differed meaningfully in both well-being and psychosocial resources, revealing patterns not captured by GDP or geographic groupings. Several middle-income countries (e.g., Argentina, Philippines, Indonesia) exhibited high well-being and resource levels, whereas some high-income countries (e.g., Germany, Hong Kong) showed moderate profiles. Approximately 86% of countries maintained their profile across waves, with a minority shifting clusters, reflecting potential contextual change. These findings suggest that national flourishing reflects the interaction of economic, cultural, and psychosocial factors, highlighting the value of multidimensional approaches to global well-being.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Patterns of National Flourishing: Multidimensional Clusters of Well-Being and Psychosocial Resources Across 22 Countries

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月19日

查看全文
  • Taylor G. Hill

摘要

National well-being reflects multiple psychological dimensions, yet cross-national research often relies on single indicators or economic proxies. Using two waves of the Global Flourishing Survey across 22 countries (Wave 1 N = 202,898; analytic sample N = 182,354), country-level profiles were identified based on nine indicators of well-being and psychosocial resources (happiness, life satisfaction, life worthwhileness, autonomy, competence, relatedness, gratitude, hope, life balance). Hierarchical and k-means clustering supported a three-profile solution in both waves. Profiles differed meaningfully in both well-being and psychosocial resources, revealing patterns not captured by GDP or geographic groupings. Several middle-income countries (e.g., Argentina, Philippines, Indonesia) exhibited high well-being and resource levels, whereas some high-income countries (e.g., Germany, Hong Kong) showed moderate profiles. Approximately 86% of countries maintained their profile across waves, with a minority shifting clusters, reflecting potential contextual change. These findings suggest that national flourishing reflects the interaction of economic, cultural, and psychosocial factors, highlighting the value of multidimensional approaches to global well-being.