<p>In this paper, a GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well infrared photodetector (QWIP) using a rectangular plasmonic microcavity structure is proposed. Based on the fact that different side lengths of the rectangular patch responding to different TM waves during surface plasmon resonance, the device has three modes of operation. In the case of TM<sub>10</sub> and TM<sub>01</sub> waves being incident alone, the response peaks of the device are located at 6.48&#xa0;μm and 7.38&#xa0;μm, which correspond to the two single-peak modes of Ex and Ey polarisation, respectively. The two response wavelengths generated by the two polarisation modes are independently regulated within a certain range and are not affected by each other. In the case of simultaneous incidence of TM<sub>10</sub> and TM<sub>01</sub> waves, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the device’s responsivity spectrum reaches 1.56&#xa0;μm, which is broadband response mode. The simulation study reveals that the average electric field enhancement |<i>E</i><sub>Z</sub>|/|<i>E</i><sub>0</sub>| in all three modes is more than 5 times, while the single-peak and broadband response mode responsivities reach 3 A/W and 2 A/W, respectively. Our findings indicate that the average energy inside the microcavity is positively correlated with the microcavity volume within a certain range. Moreover, the coupling structure exhibits favourable incident angle compatibility, and the device performance in each mode is insensitive to the incident angle in the range of ~ 45°.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Mode Switchable Quantum Well Infrared Detector with Rectangular Plasmonic Microcavity Structure

  • Jun Zhao,
  • Tongtong You,
  • Hengrui Jiang,
  • Dayuan Xiong

摘要

In this paper, a GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well infrared photodetector (QWIP) using a rectangular plasmonic microcavity structure is proposed. Based on the fact that different side lengths of the rectangular patch responding to different TM waves during surface plasmon resonance, the device has three modes of operation. In the case of TM10 and TM01 waves being incident alone, the response peaks of the device are located at 6.48 μm and 7.38 μm, which correspond to the two single-peak modes of Ex and Ey polarisation, respectively. The two response wavelengths generated by the two polarisation modes are independently regulated within a certain range and are not affected by each other. In the case of simultaneous incidence of TM10 and TM01 waves, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the device’s responsivity spectrum reaches 1.56 μm, which is broadband response mode. The simulation study reveals that the average electric field enhancement |EZ|/|E0| in all three modes is more than 5 times, while the single-peak and broadband response mode responsivities reach 3 A/W and 2 A/W, respectively. Our findings indicate that the average energy inside the microcavity is positively correlated with the microcavity volume within a certain range. Moreover, the coupling structure exhibits favourable incident angle compatibility, and the device performance in each mode is insensitive to the incident angle in the range of ~ 45°.