<p>The theory of arbitrary reference states that some semantic facts are brute. Haze claims to have articulated a <i>reductio ad absurdum</i> of this theory, and, recently, he defended this <i>reductio</i> from a rebuttal earlier advanced by Meléndez Gutiérrez. In this paper, I contest Haze’s defence, and argue that his absurdity charge on the arbitrary reference theorist is unsound.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Arbitrary Reference and Paradox

  • Sofía Meléndez Gutiérrez

摘要

The theory of arbitrary reference states that some semantic facts are brute. Haze claims to have articulated a reductio ad absurdum of this theory, and, recently, he defended this reductio from a rebuttal earlier advanced by Meléndez Gutiérrez. In this paper, I contest Haze’s defence, and argue that his absurdity charge on the arbitrary reference theorist is unsound.