Scholarlink

<p>As we celebrate the success of AI, it is necessary to investigate the boundaries of AI, <i>a la</i> Karl Popper, so that our society does not fall for misleading commercial claims, and prevent dangers of misusing AI. We chat with our readers casually on several frontier questions from if AI will replace human beings, to AI consciousness, self and nonself awareness, and to our jobs and education. While some things in this essay are speculative, some other things are mathematically proved. We argue why AI and AI generated content should be segregated, and why AGI (artificial general intelligence) cannot make innovations about things independent to human knowledge without external experiments.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Caging AI

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月1日

查看全文
  • Ming Li

摘要

As we celebrate the success of AI, it is necessary to investigate the boundaries of AI, a la Karl Popper, so that our society does not fall for misleading commercial claims, and prevent dangers of misusing AI. We chat with our readers casually on several frontier questions from if AI will replace human beings, to AI consciousness, self and nonself awareness, and to our jobs and education. While some things in this essay are speculative, some other things are mathematically proved. We argue why AI and AI generated content should be segregated, and why AGI (artificial general intelligence) cannot make innovations about things independent to human knowledge without external experiments.