Synergistic effects of climate variability and conservation efforts on soil erosion dynamics in Xinjiang (2011–2024)
摘要
Given the growing urgency of global climate change and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 15.3 to achieve global land degradation neutrality by 2030, it is essential to comprehensively investigate the primary drivers of land degradation in drylands. Xinjiang, the largest arid region in China, is severely affected by soil erosion. This erosion results from the interaction of multiple climatic and anthropogenic factors and poses a serious threat to regional ecological security. Consequently, this research aims to comprehensively evaluate the recent temporal evolution of regional soil erosion and to elucidate the underlying interactive mechanisms driving these dynamics.
Materials and methodsThis research integrates official soil erosion statistics with multi-source remote sensing covariates to construct a time-series database. The relative roles of climatic variability and anthropogenic factors are quantitatively disentangled using variance partitioning analysis (VPA).
Results and discussionThe results showed a clear trend of erosion mitigation in the study area, with the total eroded area shrinking by an average of approximately 0.49% per year. Wind erosion and water erosion areas decreased by 0.48% and 0.61% per year, respectively. Variance partitioning analysis (VPA) indicates that climate variability and soil and water conservation measures each independently accounted for 12% of the variance in soil erosion, while their interaction explains 68%, highlighting the dominance of synergistic effects. Additionally, improved soil conservation practices exhibited a significant negative correlation with erosion severity and contributed to diminished PM2.5 concentrations, implying an ancillary role in enhancing air quality.
ConclusionsThis research proposes a comprehensive causal chain analysis framework for evaluating soil erosion risk in arid ecosystems, following the logical sequence of ‘Driving Factors → Response Processes → Impact Outcomes’. Besides, the findings underscore the need for integrated management strategies that explicitly account for the complex interactions between anthropogenic factors and climate variability.