Purpose <p>This study deals with the possibility of adding some of the removed and appropriately crushed bituminous conglomerate (here called simply asphalt), as well as compost from municipal solid waste recycling, to urban depaved soils to be used as green areas, to reduce disposal costs.</p> Methods <p>For this purpose, we conducted a 5-month long pot experiment testing five treatments with different proportions of asphalt (30% v/v, 20% v/v, and 10% v/v), compost (20% v/v and 10% v/v), and excavated urban soil making up the remainder. A mix of grasses commonly used in urban green infrastructures was sown and monitored over time in terms of growth rate and morphological traits. Additionally, the possible release of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was evaluated by analysing both the constructed soils and the leachates, to ascertain if the rules requiring asphalt to be landfilled rather than reused (at least partially) in green infrastructure are reasonable.</p> Results <p>Asphalt did not have any apparent negative impact on grass growth. The release of heavy metals and PAHs was minor and anyway below the national legal standards. All substrates with asphalt showed similar or even better physico-chemical and biochemical features than the excavated soil alone, while compost addition enhanced all the grass morphometric traits investigated.</p> Conclusions <p>This study suggests that, in areas desealed for urban re-greening, utilizing a portion of the removed asphalt in place, once appropriately crushed, together with soil and compost could be a feasible and safe approach.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Removed asphalt can be used as a component of constructed soils for urban greenery

  • Bianca Rompato,
  • Riccardo Rossi,
  • Laura Giagnoni,
  • Giovanni Mastrolonardo,
  • Giovanni Argenti,
  • Nicolina Staglianò,
  • Remigio Paradelo Nuñez,
  • Giacomo Certini

摘要

Purpose

This study deals with the possibility of adding some of the removed and appropriately crushed bituminous conglomerate (here called simply asphalt), as well as compost from municipal solid waste recycling, to urban depaved soils to be used as green areas, to reduce disposal costs.

Methods

For this purpose, we conducted a 5-month long pot experiment testing five treatments with different proportions of asphalt (30% v/v, 20% v/v, and 10% v/v), compost (20% v/v and 10% v/v), and excavated urban soil making up the remainder. A mix of grasses commonly used in urban green infrastructures was sown and monitored over time in terms of growth rate and morphological traits. Additionally, the possible release of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was evaluated by analysing both the constructed soils and the leachates, to ascertain if the rules requiring asphalt to be landfilled rather than reused (at least partially) in green infrastructure are reasonable.

Results

Asphalt did not have any apparent negative impact on grass growth. The release of heavy metals and PAHs was minor and anyway below the national legal standards. All substrates with asphalt showed similar or even better physico-chemical and biochemical features than the excavated soil alone, while compost addition enhanced all the grass morphometric traits investigated.

Conclusions

This study suggests that, in areas desealed for urban re-greening, utilizing a portion of the removed asphalt in place, once appropriately crushed, together with soil and compost could be a feasible and safe approach.