Scholarlink

<p>Digital technologies have revolutionized authoritarian states’ capacity for social control through mass surveillance. However, how citizens perceive and react to escalating digital control remains understudied. This research proposes a risk-benefit analytical framework to explain how awareness of state control intentions shapes public reactions to digital surveillance in conjunction with surveillance intrusiveness. Using two independent survey experiments with over 2000 respondents, we examine the public acceptance of four digital control measures with increasing intrusiveness: CCTV cameras in public areas, CCTV cameras in residential communities, smartphone location tracking, and smartphone usage monitoring. We find that awareness of the state’s mass monitoring and targeted repression intentions significantly decreases public support, especially for more intrusive measures. Our findings suggest that while digital innovations expand authoritarian states’ surveillance capabilities, technological overreach may backfire by evoking public resistance.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

When Does Surveillance Trigger Resistance? Public Response to Escalating Digital Control in China

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月10日

查看全文
  • Dakeng Chen,
  • Jing Vivian Zhan

摘要

Digital technologies have revolutionized authoritarian states’ capacity for social control through mass surveillance. However, how citizens perceive and react to escalating digital control remains understudied. This research proposes a risk-benefit analytical framework to explain how awareness of state control intentions shapes public reactions to digital surveillance in conjunction with surveillance intrusiveness. Using two independent survey experiments with over 2000 respondents, we examine the public acceptance of four digital control measures with increasing intrusiveness: CCTV cameras in public areas, CCTV cameras in residential communities, smartphone location tracking, and smartphone usage monitoring. We find that awareness of the state’s mass monitoring and targeted repression intentions significantly decreases public support, especially for more intrusive measures. Our findings suggest that while digital innovations expand authoritarian states’ surveillance capabilities, technological overreach may backfire by evoking public resistance.