<p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present a significant environmental issue due to their widespread occurrence and potential toxicity to exposed organisms. Our study investigated PFAS concentrations present in a range of freshwater biota exposed to wastewater discharge and urban stormwater runoff from creeks and rivers in Victoria, Australia. We also assessed bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) in fish, and conducted a human health risk assessment. We sampled 18 sites located along seven waterways (4 effluent-receiving, 1 urban stormwater and 2 reference waterways) with three sampling locations at each of the polluted waterways: at the discharge point, and upstream and downstream of discharge. We analysed freshwater (<i>n</i> = 56), crustacea (<i>n</i> = 18), and fish (<i>n</i> = 242 from 12 species) samples for 32 PFAS. Our study shows that the concentrations and range of PFAS present were highest in samples from the urban stormwater waterway (mean ∑<sub>32</sub>PFAS water concentration = 0.12&#xa0;µg/L), followed by the wastewater-exposed waterways (mean ∑<sub>32</sub>PFAS = 0.027&#xa0;µg/L), and then the control reference waterways (mean ∑<sub>32</sub>PFAS = 0.0043&#xa0;µg/L). The higher concentrations found in the urban waterway suggests that stormwater may be a greater source of PFAS pollution than wastewater discharges. Additionally, the highest BAFs were for PFOS, PFDA, and PFHxS, and occurred in fish with a carnivorous diet. Lastly, consumption of three portions of fish per week caught from the urban stormwater and several effluent-receiving waterways could result in exceedances of health-based guidance values for PFOS in children.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The impact of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on freshwater fish and implications for human health

  • Hung Tan,
  • Isabella Gore,
  • Simon Sharp,
  • Dean Johnstone,
  • Phoebe Lewis,
  • Antti Mikkonen,
  • Minna Saaristo

摘要

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present a significant environmental issue due to their widespread occurrence and potential toxicity to exposed organisms. Our study investigated PFAS concentrations present in a range of freshwater biota exposed to wastewater discharge and urban stormwater runoff from creeks and rivers in Victoria, Australia. We also assessed bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) in fish, and conducted a human health risk assessment. We sampled 18 sites located along seven waterways (4 effluent-receiving, 1 urban stormwater and 2 reference waterways) with three sampling locations at each of the polluted waterways: at the discharge point, and upstream and downstream of discharge. We analysed freshwater (n = 56), crustacea (n = 18), and fish (n = 242 from 12 species) samples for 32 PFAS. Our study shows that the concentrations and range of PFAS present were highest in samples from the urban stormwater waterway (mean ∑32PFAS water concentration = 0.12 µg/L), followed by the wastewater-exposed waterways (mean ∑32PFAS = 0.027 µg/L), and then the control reference waterways (mean ∑32PFAS = 0.0043 µg/L). The higher concentrations found in the urban waterway suggests that stormwater may be a greater source of PFAS pollution than wastewater discharges. Additionally, the highest BAFs were for PFOS, PFDA, and PFHxS, and occurred in fish with a carnivorous diet. Lastly, consumption of three portions of fish per week caught from the urban stormwater and several effluent-receiving waterways could result in exceedances of health-based guidance values for PFOS in children.