<p>In modern societies, especially in developed countries, textile waste management has become a critical issue due to overconsumption and throw-away culture. This case study aims to develop a comprehensive quantitative energy demand and carbon footprint analysis model using CCalC2 software to identify the most sustainable end-of-life management practices for the textile waste in Australia, the second-largest consumers of textile products. Results of this study showed that chemical recycling is the best option from the standpoint of saving pulp production energy and recycled pulp material, while it is a carbon-intensive process (6401&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq/1000&#xa0;kg). The mechanical recycling process is estimated to emit around 5368&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq/1000&#xa0;kg — a low CO<sub>2</sub> emitting process. Surprisingly, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from incineration (e.g., 5897&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq/1000&#xa0;kg) showed a similar trend of mechanical recycling, and the option of incineration could only be pursued if (thermal) energy recovery and electricity production were considered. This study highlights the requirement for sustainable textile waste management practices and provides valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders for future policy planning around low carbon-intensive technology selection with improved (secondary) material recovery.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparative energy demand and carbon footprint analysis of textile waste management systems in Australia

  • Mahbuba Imroz Khan,
  • Md Tasbirul Islam,
  • Lijing Wang,
  • Rajiv Padhye

摘要

In modern societies, especially in developed countries, textile waste management has become a critical issue due to overconsumption and throw-away culture. This case study aims to develop a comprehensive quantitative energy demand and carbon footprint analysis model using CCalC2 software to identify the most sustainable end-of-life management practices for the textile waste in Australia, the second-largest consumers of textile products. Results of this study showed that chemical recycling is the best option from the standpoint of saving pulp production energy and recycled pulp material, while it is a carbon-intensive process (6401 kg CO2eq/1000 kg). The mechanical recycling process is estimated to emit around 5368 kg CO2eq/1000 kg — a low CO2 emitting process. Surprisingly, CO2 emissions from incineration (e.g., 5897 kg CO2eq/1000 kg) showed a similar trend of mechanical recycling, and the option of incineration could only be pursued if (thermal) energy recovery and electricity production were considered. This study highlights the requirement for sustainable textile waste management practices and provides valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders for future policy planning around low carbon-intensive technology selection with improved (secondary) material recovery.