Background <p>Mechanical properties of human teeth are key for understanding functions and developing restorative materials, and the distribution of micromechanical properties across the enamel-dentine junction has been rarely explored by micro-scratch tests, especially under clinically-relevant forces.</p> Objective <p>This study aims to explore the localized mechanical responses of the enamel and dentine of a human molar by both nanoindentation and micro-scratch methods.</p> Methods <p>Nanoindentation and micro-scratch tests were carried out on enamel and dentine of a human molar.</p> Results <p>The mechanical properties (e.g., contact modulus, indentation hardness, wear resistance, plastic deformation resistance, elastic strain capacity, and brittleness index) of enamel and dentine were measured and compared: the enamel exhibits superior mechanical properties (e.g., higher contact modulus, indentation hardness, wear/plastic deformation resistance, and elastic strain capacity) compared to dentine; and dentine has a much smaller brittleness index than enamel.</p> Conclusions <p>The superior mechanical properties of enamel enable human teeth to maintain bio-functionality in harsh environment, and the smaller brittleness index of dentine allows teeth to absorb mechanical energy from repeated contact/impact without causing structural damages.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Localized Deformation of Human Tooth

  • R. Liang,
  • Z. Xu,
  • M. Liu,
  • J. Jiang,
  • F. Yang

摘要

Background

Mechanical properties of human teeth are key for understanding functions and developing restorative materials, and the distribution of micromechanical properties across the enamel-dentine junction has been rarely explored by micro-scratch tests, especially under clinically-relevant forces.

Objective

This study aims to explore the localized mechanical responses of the enamel and dentine of a human molar by both nanoindentation and micro-scratch methods.

Methods

Nanoindentation and micro-scratch tests were carried out on enamel and dentine of a human molar.

Results

The mechanical properties (e.g., contact modulus, indentation hardness, wear resistance, plastic deformation resistance, elastic strain capacity, and brittleness index) of enamel and dentine were measured and compared: the enamel exhibits superior mechanical properties (e.g., higher contact modulus, indentation hardness, wear/plastic deformation resistance, and elastic strain capacity) compared to dentine; and dentine has a much smaller brittleness index than enamel.

Conclusions

The superior mechanical properties of enamel enable human teeth to maintain bio-functionality in harsh environment, and the smaller brittleness index of dentine allows teeth to absorb mechanical energy from repeated contact/impact without causing structural damages.