Scholarlink

Background <p>Sleep apnea is traditionally diagnosed with polysomnography (PSG), which, while effective, is costly, time-consuming, and obtrusive. Recent advancements in biosensing technologies have facilitated the development of under-the-mattress devices as potential alternatives for detecting sleep apnea.</p> Methods <p>We reviewed the literature across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, focusing on studies that assessed mattress-like or under-the-mattress biosensing devices for sleep apnea. 15 studies were included as illustrative examples of recent progress.</p> Results <p>Our review assessed studies on innovative sensor technologies for sleep apnea detection. These studies demonstrated the efficacy of various sensors—such as Load Cells, Emfit, and PVDF—along with advanced radar and machine learning methods, in accurately identifying sleep apnea events. Results indicated that most studies reported good overall performance of mattress-based systems compared to traditional polysomnography, though variability across devices was observed.</p> Conclusion <p>Under-the-mattress biosensing devices appear to be promising as cost-effective, user-friendly, and unobtrusive alternatives to PSG for sleep apnea detection. Their high-performance metrics suggest that these devices are viable options for both clinical settings and home use.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Tracing the evolution in sleep apnea detection: a review from traditional non-contact under-the-mattress devices to advanced AI-driven methods

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月26日

查看全文
  • Sara Daneshvar,
  • Mehran Rahimi,
  • Khalil Ansarin

摘要

Background

Sleep apnea is traditionally diagnosed with polysomnography (PSG), which, while effective, is costly, time-consuming, and obtrusive. Recent advancements in biosensing technologies have facilitated the development of under-the-mattress devices as potential alternatives for detecting sleep apnea.

Methods

We reviewed the literature across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, focusing on studies that assessed mattress-like or under-the-mattress biosensing devices for sleep apnea. 15 studies were included as illustrative examples of recent progress.

Results

Our review assessed studies on innovative sensor technologies for sleep apnea detection. These studies demonstrated the efficacy of various sensors—such as Load Cells, Emfit, and PVDF—along with advanced radar and machine learning methods, in accurately identifying sleep apnea events. Results indicated that most studies reported good overall performance of mattress-based systems compared to traditional polysomnography, though variability across devices was observed.

Conclusion

Under-the-mattress biosensing devices appear to be promising as cost-effective, user-friendly, and unobtrusive alternatives to PSG for sleep apnea detection. Their high-performance metrics suggest that these devices are viable options for both clinical settings and home use.