Objectives <p>Police chiefs are among the most visible and consequential leaders in local government. Despite their importance, little empirical research examines which leadership credentials the public values most when evaluating candidates for the chief of police position. This study addresses that gap by examining how the public weighs competing credentials when evaluating police chief applicants, with particular attention to evidence-based policing and the implementation of professional standards.</p> Methods <p>The study employs a mixed-methods design, combining a discrete-choice experiment with a conjoint design and thematic analysis of qualitative data.</p> Results <p>Emphasis on professional standards was the most influential attribute in respondents’ selection decisions. Population size served and commitment to evidence-based policing tied for second, followed by years of experience. The applicant’s current position was the least influential attribute. Respondents preferred applicants with external credentials in professional standards and evidence-based policing over those who helped implement those practices but lacked such credentials.</p> Conclusion <p>The public places significant value on external credentials in professional standardsand evidence-based policing when evaluating police chief candidates.</p>