Scholarlink

<p>E. faecalis is one of the most important microbiological factors responsible for the failures after root canal treatment. The knowledge about the efficacy of HEBP and PAA with different concentrations, when they are used alone or associated with NaOCl on E. faecalis biofilms is limited. In the present study, the efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 9% and 18% etidronic acid (HEBP), and 1% and 2% peracetic acid (PAA), used alone or in combination with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), was evaluated on dentine discs experimentally infected with Enterococcus faecalis biofilms using a laser scanning confocal microscope. Irrigation of the samples using HEBP solutions in combination with NaOCl decreased the viability of E.faecalis more effectively compared with the sole use of 9% HEBP and 18% HEBP solutions. The use of two different concentrations of peracetic acid (1–2%) and etidronic acid (9–18%) resulted in similar biofilm elimination when these chelators were used alone or in combination with NaOCl. The sole use of 2% peracetic acid in the experimentally infected samples eliminated more biofilm than the use of 9% and 18% HEBP. Lower concentrations of peracetic acid and etidronic acid can be recommended to remove the E.faecalis biofilms from root canals to decrease the irrigation solutions’ potential harmful effects.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic, and peracetic acids with different concentrations on the removal of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms from root canal walls: an in vitro study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月6日

查看全文
  • Salev Zeyrek,
  • Özgür İlke Ulusoy,
  • Gülçin Akca,
  • İlke Gaye Savur

摘要

E. faecalis is one of the most important microbiological factors responsible for the failures after root canal treatment. The knowledge about the efficacy of HEBP and PAA with different concentrations, when they are used alone or associated with NaOCl on E. faecalis biofilms is limited. In the present study, the efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 9% and 18% etidronic acid (HEBP), and 1% and 2% peracetic acid (PAA), used alone or in combination with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), was evaluated on dentine discs experimentally infected with Enterococcus faecalis biofilms using a laser scanning confocal microscope. Irrigation of the samples using HEBP solutions in combination with NaOCl decreased the viability of E.faecalis more effectively compared with the sole use of 9% HEBP and 18% HEBP solutions. The use of two different concentrations of peracetic acid (1–2%) and etidronic acid (9–18%) resulted in similar biofilm elimination when these chelators were used alone or in combination with NaOCl. The sole use of 2% peracetic acid in the experimentally infected samples eliminated more biofilm than the use of 9% and 18% HEBP. Lower concentrations of peracetic acid and etidronic acid can be recommended to remove the E.faecalis biofilms from root canals to decrease the irrigation solutions’ potential harmful effects.