<p>Reference evapotranspiration (ET) is essential for agricultural planning and water management, especially in semi-arid areas like Türkiye’s Siirt province. This study predicted monthly ET using machine learning methods (SVM, XgBoost, KNN, RF) and statistical regression models (Quartile, PLS, LASSO, Ridge, Elastic Net, NonParametric, Linear), as well as a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach. Models used climate variables such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, sunshine hours, snow thickness, pressure, cloudiness, and solar radiation. RF was the best-performing machine learning model (R²=0.948), while XgBoost was the lowest (R²=0.776). Among regression methods, NonParametric regression performed best (R²=0.948), and PLS performed weakest (R²=0.901). The DoE model showed the highest accuracy overall (R²=0.987), identifying average temperature as the key variable affecting ET. The findings improve prediction accuracy and offer new insights for hydrological understanding and practical applications in water management, agriculture, and climate adaptation in Siirt.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Machine Learning as a Tool to Predict Reference Evapotranspiration

  • Safa Alkanjo,
  • Kübra Kaya,
  • Veysi Kartal,
  • Veysel Süleyman Yavuz,
  • Michael Nones

摘要

Reference evapotranspiration (ET) is essential for agricultural planning and water management, especially in semi-arid areas like Türkiye’s Siirt province. This study predicted monthly ET using machine learning methods (SVM, XgBoost, KNN, RF) and statistical regression models (Quartile, PLS, LASSO, Ridge, Elastic Net, NonParametric, Linear), as well as a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach. Models used climate variables such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, sunshine hours, snow thickness, pressure, cloudiness, and solar radiation. RF was the best-performing machine learning model (R²=0.948), while XgBoost was the lowest (R²=0.776). Among regression methods, NonParametric regression performed best (R²=0.948), and PLS performed weakest (R²=0.901). The DoE model showed the highest accuracy overall (R²=0.987), identifying average temperature as the key variable affecting ET. The findings improve prediction accuracy and offer new insights for hydrological understanding and practical applications in water management, agriculture, and climate adaptation in Siirt.