<p>In the realm of flow measurement using rectangular sharp-crested weirs, the stage-discharge relationship, primarily represented by the discharge coefficient (<i>C</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>), holds paramount significance. In order to comprehend and predict the behavior of <i>C</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> effectively, six machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Adaboost (ADB), Xgboost (XGB) and Catboost (CATB), are assessed. The performances of each of these approaches have been evaluated based on statistical criterions and using Taylor diagram. It is revealed that all six techniques can predict the discharge coefficient with excellent accuracy, with the Catboost model outperforming the other models. In the prediction of <i>C</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>, the values of the coefficient of determination and root mean square error obtained from the CATB model are 0.9782 and 0.0064, respectively. The extensive nonlinear behaviour exhibited by the ML models is also addressed using shapely additives explanation (SHAP) framework. Further, a comparison of the predictions of ML approaches with the results of existing empirical formulas has been made. The accuracy of ML approaches is found to be much higher than that of either of the existing empirical formulas, indicating the superior prediction capability of ML models.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluating Discharge Coefficient of Rectangular Sharp Crested Weirs Using Machine Learning Models

  • Mrinmoy Dhar,
  • Sanjog Chhetri Sapkota,
  • Prasenjit Saha,
  • Sameer Arora

摘要

In the realm of flow measurement using rectangular sharp-crested weirs, the stage-discharge relationship, primarily represented by the discharge coefficient (Cd), holds paramount significance. In order to comprehend and predict the behavior of Cd effectively, six machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Adaboost (ADB), Xgboost (XGB) and Catboost (CATB), are assessed. The performances of each of these approaches have been evaluated based on statistical criterions and using Taylor diagram. It is revealed that all six techniques can predict the discharge coefficient with excellent accuracy, with the Catboost model outperforming the other models. In the prediction of Cd, the values of the coefficient of determination and root mean square error obtained from the CATB model are 0.9782 and 0.0064, respectively. The extensive nonlinear behaviour exhibited by the ML models is also addressed using shapely additives explanation (SHAP) framework. Further, a comparison of the predictions of ML approaches with the results of existing empirical formulas has been made. The accuracy of ML approaches is found to be much higher than that of either of the existing empirical formulas, indicating the superior prediction capability of ML models.