Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Recently, the EAU guidelines presented the EAU guidelines bot to assist urologists in the reading of the guidelines; however, up to date, no external validation is available. The aim of our study is to assess the accuracy, completeness, and clarity of the guideline’s bot in testicular cancer.</p> Methods <p>A total of 36 questions based on the EAU testicular cancer guidelines recommendations were developed. Each question was systematically presented to the EAU guidelines bot and the responses were independently assessed by two expert urologists to assess the accuracy, completeness, and clarity. A 5-point Likert scale was used as a score, and in case of discrepancies, a third urologist was queried. Accuracy, completeness, and clarity were assessed per chapter and per grade of recommendation. All questions and answers were recorded in an Excel file.</p> Results <p>Overall, 36 questions were developed. In terms of accuracy, 36/36 (100%) were defined as excellent (score 5). In terms of completeness, 23/36 (64%) were defined as totally complete (score = 5), 8/36 (22%) presented a good completeness (score = 4), while 5/36 (14%) were fairly complete (score = 3). Finally, in terms of clarity, 31/36 (86%) were defined as totally clear (score = 5) and 5 /36 (14%) were defined as almost totally clear (score = 4). None of the answers was evaluated as non-accurate, non-complete, or non-clear.</p> Conclusions <p>EAU guidelines bot represents an accurate tool for testicular cancer management.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Accuracy, readability, and understandability of EAU guidelines bot for testicular cancer

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月23日

查看全文
  • Giacomo Gallo,
  • Riccardo Lombardo,
  • Vincenzo Pagliarulo,
  • Manfredi Bruno Sequi,
  • Ludovica Maria Coppola,
  • Eleonora Rosato,
  • Matteo Romagnoli,
  • Sabrina De Cillis,
  • Enrico Checcucci,
  • Daniele Amparore,
  • Mauro Ragonese,
  • Nazzario Foschi,
  • Valerio Santarelli,
  • Pietro Spatafora,
  • Giorgia Tema,
  • Antonio Nacchia,
  • Antonio Cicione,
  • Antonio Franco,
  • Antonio Luigi Pastore,
  • Yazan Al Salhi,
  • Bernardo Rocco,
  • Mauro Gacci,
  • Cristian Fiori,
  • Enrico Finazzi Agrò,
  • Alessandro Sciarra,
  • Andrea Tubaro,
  • Cosimo De Nunzio

摘要

Purpose

Recently, the EAU guidelines presented the EAU guidelines bot to assist urologists in the reading of the guidelines; however, up to date, no external validation is available. The aim of our study is to assess the accuracy, completeness, and clarity of the guideline’s bot in testicular cancer.

Methods

A total of 36 questions based on the EAU testicular cancer guidelines recommendations were developed. Each question was systematically presented to the EAU guidelines bot and the responses were independently assessed by two expert urologists to assess the accuracy, completeness, and clarity. A 5-point Likert scale was used as a score, and in case of discrepancies, a third urologist was queried. Accuracy, completeness, and clarity were assessed per chapter and per grade of recommendation. All questions and answers were recorded in an Excel file.

Results

Overall, 36 questions were developed. In terms of accuracy, 36/36 (100%) were defined as excellent (score 5). In terms of completeness, 23/36 (64%) were defined as totally complete (score = 5), 8/36 (22%) presented a good completeness (score = 4), while 5/36 (14%) were fairly complete (score = 3). Finally, in terms of clarity, 31/36 (86%) were defined as totally clear (score = 5) and 5 /36 (14%) were defined as almost totally clear (score = 4). None of the answers was evaluated as non-accurate, non-complete, or non-clear.

Conclusions

EAU guidelines bot represents an accurate tool for testicular cancer management.