<p>This study investigates the sliding wear and electrochemical corrosion behaviors of single-crystal copper with (100), (110), and (111) orientations under different loading and frequency conditions. A multifunctional friction and wear tester, an electrochemical workstation, and a scanning electron microscope were employed to observe worn and corroded morphology and to explore the wear and corrosion mechanisms. The experimental results indicate that crystal orientation significantly influences the wear and corrosion resistance of single-crystal copper. The Cu (111) surface, characterized by its high atomic density, exhibits low adhesion and relatively good wear resistance. In contrast, Cu (110) has a lower hardness, a larger wear volume, more severe surface damage, and inferior wear resistance. The wear morphology of Cu (100) is less pronounced, while Cu (111) experiences enhanced wear at higher frequencies. Electrochemical tests revealed that the E<sub>corr</sub> followed the order (110) &gt; (100) &gt; (111), with a negative shift of 18.97&#xa0;mV in the polarization curve. The I<sub>corr</sub> increased by approximately 0.93 times.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effect of (100), (110), and (111) Preferred Orientations on Wear and Corrosion Properties of Single Crystal Copper

  • E. Xue,
  • Jian Shang,
  • Simeng Liu

摘要

This study investigates the sliding wear and electrochemical corrosion behaviors of single-crystal copper with (100), (110), and (111) orientations under different loading and frequency conditions. A multifunctional friction and wear tester, an electrochemical workstation, and a scanning electron microscope were employed to observe worn and corroded morphology and to explore the wear and corrosion mechanisms. The experimental results indicate that crystal orientation significantly influences the wear and corrosion resistance of single-crystal copper. The Cu (111) surface, characterized by its high atomic density, exhibits low adhesion and relatively good wear resistance. In contrast, Cu (110) has a lower hardness, a larger wear volume, more severe surface damage, and inferior wear resistance. The wear morphology of Cu (100) is less pronounced, while Cu (111) experiences enhanced wear at higher frequencies. Electrochemical tests revealed that the Ecorr followed the order (110) > (100) > (111), with a negative shift of 18.97 mV in the polarization curve. The Icorr increased by approximately 0.93 times.