Scholarlink

<p>We explore the various ways in which terms and utterances can be weaponized, particularly in the service of establishing and defending an authoritarian regime.&#xa0;While there exists an extensive philosophical literature on how speech can harm, our more specific interest in this essay is on the processes of weaponizing speech. That is,&#xa0;we&#xa0;explore how language that does not begin as a weapon can be engineered into a variety of weapons that inflict different kinds of harm. The Trump administration, we argue, has been particularly effective at building a well-stocked and diversified discursive arsenal that enforces and defends authoritrianism. It has&#xa0;engaged in a multifaceted discursive engineering project to retool and retrofit language in order to entrench its own power, amplify its goals,&#xa0;delegitimize opponents, and render&#xa0;dissent from its ideas or resistance against its authority risky and difficult.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Building a Discursive Arsenal: Engineering Weaponized Speech in the Service of Authoritarianism

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月16日

查看全文
  • Quill R Kukla,
  • Mark N. Lance

摘要

We explore the various ways in which terms and utterances can be weaponized, particularly in the service of establishing and defending an authoritarian regime. While there exists an extensive philosophical literature on how speech can harm, our more specific interest in this essay is on the processes of weaponizing speech. That is, we explore how language that does not begin as a weapon can be engineered into a variety of weapons that inflict different kinds of harm. The Trump administration, we argue, has been particularly effective at building a well-stocked and diversified discursive arsenal that enforces and defends authoritrianism. It has engaged in a multifaceted discursive engineering project to retool and retrofit language in order to entrench its own power, amplify its goals, delegitimize opponents, and render dissent from its ideas or resistance against its authority risky and difficult.