<p>There appears to be an epistemic gap between the personal and the impersonal. The apparent epistemic gap presents a challenge to reductionist views about personal identity according to which facts about personal identity are grounded in impersonal facts about physical and/or psychological continuity. I discuss and reject two strategies of trying to close the apparent epistemic gap, a phenomenalist and a Cartesian one. I then develop and motivate an alternative account based on the special perspectival character of inside imagination. The imagination-based account explains why there seems to be an epistemic gap between the personal and the impersonal and at the same time avoids a corresponding ontological gap.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The epistemic gap between the personal and the impersonal

  • Clas Weber

摘要

There appears to be an epistemic gap between the personal and the impersonal. The apparent epistemic gap presents a challenge to reductionist views about personal identity according to which facts about personal identity are grounded in impersonal facts about physical and/or psychological continuity. I discuss and reject two strategies of trying to close the apparent epistemic gap, a phenomenalist and a Cartesian one. I then develop and motivate an alternative account based on the special perspectival character of inside imagination. The imagination-based account explains why there seems to be an epistemic gap between the personal and the impersonal and at the same time avoids a corresponding ontological gap.