<p>Discoveries in particle physics have traditionally occurred through direct detection, usually by producing new particles in particle accelerators. However, the lack of new discoveries from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN has undermined confidence that direct discovery is likely at technologically accessible energies. In this paper, I provide an epistemic analysis of more and less direct search strategies in current-day particle physics. I make explicit the epistemic features of these search strategies in what is has traditionally been called the process of scientific discovery. I describe two promising methods of indirect detection of new physics, possible to conduct at comparatively lower energies and at significantly reduced cost: precision measurement and anomaly detection via unsupervised machine learning. I argue that indirect detections can reliably lead to discovery, and that direct versus indirect searches have complementary epistemic and practical advantages. I provide an account of indirect discovery that proceeds from discrepancies, to anomalies, and finally to (theory-mediated) discovery. I further argue that these methods are capable of leading to new discoveries when mediated through the generalized effective field theory framework. Indirect searches should not replace direct detection efforts; instead, they provide complementary epistemic advantages and jointly make for a more exhaustive search for physics beyond the Standard Model.</p>