Since Meyer and Dunn showed that the rule \(\gamma \) is admissible in \({\textbf{E}}\) , relevantists have produced new proofs of the admissibility of \(\gamma \) for an ever more expansive list of relevant logics. We show in this paper that this is not cause to think that this is the norm; rather \(\gamma \) fails to be admissible in a wide variety of relevant logics. As an upshot, we suggest that the proper view of \(\gamma \) -admissibility is as a coherence criterion, and thus as a selection criterion for logical theory choice.
