<p>In this short communication, we examine the vector field of the gradient of the electronic potential energy density, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, in the free 4,5-dichloro-1,2,3-dithiazolium chloride ion pair, in its crystalline form (Appel’s salt), in the picolinic acid N-oxide molecule, and in the hexagonal polymorph of boron nitride (h-BN). The superposition of this field, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, with the vector field of the electron density gradient <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nabla\rho(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the total static force field <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{F}(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and the electrostatic force field <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbf{F}_{\text{es}}(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> reveals a close correspondence in the spatial partitioning of physical space among the first three. In particular, for a typical polar covalent bond <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\omega\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\omega\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denote the nuclei of the electron-donor and electron-acceptor atoms, respectively, the atomic-like basin <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega_{W}^{\omega}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, defined in <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and associated with the&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\omega\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> nucleus, permeates into the neighboring atomic basin <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega_{S}^{\alpha}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, defined in <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nabla\rho(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and associated with the&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> nucleus, thereby following the force-field pseudoatomic basin <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega_{P}^{\omega}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, defined in <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{F}(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and associated with the&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\omega\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> nucleus. As is commonly the case for a polar noncovalent interatomic interaction <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\omega\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>···<InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the corresponding permeation of <InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega_{W}^{\omega}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> lags behind that of <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega_{P}^{\omega}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> or is virtually absent. Thus, at least for the compounds examined herein,&#xa0;the behavior of <InlineEquation ID="IEq23"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> tends to reproduce that of <InlineEquation ID="IEq24"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{F}(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which—when analyzed jointly with <InlineEquation ID="IEq25"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nabla\rho(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq26"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbf{F}_{\text{es}}(\mathbf{r})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>—may serve to discriminate between chemical bonds in which the contribution to the electronic charge transferred interatomically is predominantly covalent or predominantly noncovalent.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Structural topology of the vector field of the electronic virial energy density gradient in relation to the electron-transfer-induced responsive phenomenon

  • Sergey V. Kartashov,
  • Alina F. Saifina,
  • Robert R. Fayzullin

摘要

In this short communication, we examine the vector field of the gradient of the electronic potential energy density, \(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\) , in the free 4,5-dichloro-1,2,3-dithiazolium chloride ion pair, in its crystalline form (Appel’s salt), in the picolinic acid N-oxide molecule, and in the hexagonal polymorph of boron nitride (h-BN). The superposition of this field, \(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\) , with the vector field of the electron density gradient \(\nabla\rho(\mathbf{r})\) , the total static force field \(\mathcal{F}(\mathbf{r})\) , and the electrostatic force field \(\mathbf{F}_{\text{es}}(\mathbf{r})\) reveals a close correspondence in the spatial partitioning of physical space among the first three. In particular, for a typical polar covalent bond \(\omega\) \(\alpha\) , where \(\omega\) and \(\alpha\) denote the nuclei of the electron-donor and electron-acceptor atoms, respectively, the atomic-like basin \(\Omega_{W}^{\omega}\) , defined in \(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\) and associated with the  \(\omega\) nucleus, permeates into the neighboring atomic basin \(\Omega_{S}^{\alpha}\) , defined in \(\nabla\rho(\mathbf{r})\) and associated with the  \(\alpha\) nucleus, thereby following the force-field pseudoatomic basin \(\Omega_{P}^{\omega}\) , defined in \(\mathcal{F}(\mathbf{r})\) and associated with the  \(\omega\) nucleus. As is commonly the case for a polar noncovalent interatomic interaction \(\omega\) ··· \(\alpha\) , the corresponding permeation of \(\Omega_{W}^{\omega}\) lags behind that of \(\Omega_{P}^{\omega}\) or is virtually absent. Thus, at least for the compounds examined herein, the behavior of \(\nabla\!\left[-v(\mathbf{r})\right]\) tends to reproduce that of \(\mathcal{F}(\mathbf{r})\) , which—when analyzed jointly with \(\nabla\rho(\mathbf{r})\) and \(\mathbf{F}_{\text{es}}(\mathbf{r})\) —may serve to discriminate between chemical bonds in which the contribution to the electronic charge transferred interatomically is predominantly covalent or predominantly noncovalent.