<p>Two possible model reaction mechanisms of trimethylphosphine-catalyzed oxa-Michael addition of phenol and methanol to acrolein, one in which trimethylphosphine acts as a nuclephile and adds to acrolein to generate the enolate anion (mechanism 1) and the other in which trimethylphosphine acts as a base and reacts with the hydroxyl compound to generate PhO<sup>−</sup> /MeO<sup>−</sup> anion (mechanism 2), were computed in the gas phase using the B3LYP functional and the ωB97XD functional which incorporates dispersion correction, with the same basis set, 6–31 + G(d). In mechanism 1, the third step involving the attack of PhO<sup>−</sup> or MeO<sup>−</sup> on the intermediate, Int.2 accompanied by the loss of Me<sub>3</sub>P occurring through TS3 is the rate-determining step. In this case, however, the activation free energy for the attack of PhO<sup>−</sup> is found to be smaller than for MeO<sup>−</sup>, which is contrary to the experimental results wherein methanol is reported to react faster than phenol. In mechanism 2, the second step involving nucleophilic attack of the PhO<sup>−</sup> or MeO<sup>−</sup> anion on C3 of acrolein via TS2’ is the rate-differentiating step vis-à-vis the reactions of phenol and methanol with acrolein. In this case, the activation free energy barrier for PhO<sup>−</sup> is much higher than for MeO<sup>−</sup>; in fact, the reaction with latter is found to be barrierless. It is in perfect compliance with the experimental results. These results indicate that trimethylphosphine-catalyzed oxa-Michael addition of phenol and methanol with acrolein occurs via the mechanism in which phosphine acts as a base. Acetonitrile is found to lower the activation energies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The mechanism of the phosphine-catalyzed oxa-Michael reaction: a DFT investigation

  • Priyanka Suthar,
  • Ruchi Singh,
  • Raj K. Bansal

摘要

Two possible model reaction mechanisms of trimethylphosphine-catalyzed oxa-Michael addition of phenol and methanol to acrolein, one in which trimethylphosphine acts as a nuclephile and adds to acrolein to generate the enolate anion (mechanism 1) and the other in which trimethylphosphine acts as a base and reacts with the hydroxyl compound to generate PhO /MeO anion (mechanism 2), were computed in the gas phase using the B3LYP functional and the ωB97XD functional which incorporates dispersion correction, with the same basis set, 6–31 + G(d). In mechanism 1, the third step involving the attack of PhO or MeO on the intermediate, Int.2 accompanied by the loss of Me3P occurring through TS3 is the rate-determining step. In this case, however, the activation free energy for the attack of PhO is found to be smaller than for MeO, which is contrary to the experimental results wherein methanol is reported to react faster than phenol. In mechanism 2, the second step involving nucleophilic attack of the PhO or MeO anion on C3 of acrolein via TS2’ is the rate-differentiating step vis-à-vis the reactions of phenol and methanol with acrolein. In this case, the activation free energy barrier for PhO is much higher than for MeO; in fact, the reaction with latter is found to be barrierless. It is in perfect compliance with the experimental results. These results indicate that trimethylphosphine-catalyzed oxa-Michael addition of phenol and methanol with acrolein occurs via the mechanism in which phosphine acts as a base. Acetonitrile is found to lower the activation energies.